1960
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.4.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Mechanism of Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
793
0
5

Year Published

1963
1963
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,261 publications
(820 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
22
793
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the lower blocking temperature for Ferritin II than that for PIC, even though K(Ferritin II);;:: K(PIC), is due to that KV for Ferritin II is still smaller than the comparable value for PIC due to the latter's larger volume. From either the pair or single-ion model of magnetic anisotropy [48][49][50][51][52][53][54] it is apparent how Fe 2 + ions bonding to the surface of the Ferritin II core would increase the magnetic anisotropy of the particle, however, such Fe2+ ions may prevent the occurrence of the spin-canting or the 'extremity moments' of Neel, i.e. the magnetostatic couple produced by such antiferromagnetic particles' surfaces in a mag netic field, which gives rise to the superantiferro magnetic effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the lower blocking temperature for Ferritin II than that for PIC, even though K(Ferritin II);;:: K(PIC), is due to that KV for Ferritin II is still smaller than the comparable value for PIC due to the latter's larger volume. From either the pair or single-ion model of magnetic anisotropy [48][49][50][51][52][53][54] it is apparent how Fe 2 + ions bonding to the surface of the Ferritin II core would increase the magnetic anisotropy of the particle, however, such Fe2+ ions may prevent the occurrence of the spin-canting or the 'extremity moments' of Neel, i.e. the magnetostatic couple produced by such antiferromagnetic particles' surfaces in a mag netic field, which gives rise to the superantiferro magnetic effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the magnitude of t F and t T , it is desirable to analyse the linear response of the magnetization vector in a saturated magnetization state to a small electric current. In this case, the magnetization is uniform and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction can be neglected 18 . In a simplified scenario shown in Fig.…”
Section: Current-induced Magnetization Reorientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well-known, J ij is the scalar Heisenberg coupling and the energy term − e i J A ij e j = D ij ( e i × e j ) corresponds to the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction with D ij being the DM vector [16,17]. Furthermore, the magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE), defined as the energy difference between two uniformly magnetized states of the system, e i = e α and e i = e β (∀i), can be expressed as a sum of on-site and two-site anisotropies, ∆E os and ∆E ts , ∆E = E( e α ) − E( e β ) = ∆E os + ∆E ts ,…”
Section: Theory and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%