2003
DOI: 10.1177/1461444803005002003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere

Abstract: New media have been widely used by radical groups of both Left and Right to advance their political projects. The aim of this article to provide a theoretical framework, through developing the concepts of public sphere and counter-public sphere, which allows us to understand the growing importance of alternative media in society and to indicate how this framework might generate questions for empirical research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
194
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
194
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other side, Downey and Fenton (2003) quote the expression "bad civil society" from Chambers and Kopstein (2001) described as being capable of creating a counter public sphere that could alter democratic public dialogue. Lunat (2008) notes that the Internet leads in several cases in developing countries to promoting violence due to the 'fragile structure' of public spheres in these communities.…”
Section: The Internet and Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, Downey and Fenton (2003) quote the expression "bad civil society" from Chambers and Kopstein (2001) described as being capable of creating a counter public sphere that could alter democratic public dialogue. Lunat (2008) notes that the Internet leads in several cases in developing countries to promoting violence due to the 'fragile structure' of public spheres in these communities.…”
Section: The Internet and Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of the counter-public sphere helps us better understand the increasingly important role of citizen journalism today. A counter-public sphere resists dominant communications, offering citizens forms of solidarity that are grounded in a collective experience of marginalisation and expropriation (Downey & Fenton, 2003). Citizen podcasts in Korea permit ordinary individuals to construct an inexpensive virtual counter-public sphere against the mass-media public sphere, as Castells (2007, p. 249) aptly said, 'The emergence of mass self communication offers an extraordinary medium for social movements and rebellious individuals to build their autonomy and confront the institutions of society in their own terms and around their own projects.'…”
Section: Media Landscape and The Public Sphere Of South Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen journalism forms a counter public sphere that seeks to challenge the dominant public sphere of a society beyond mere independence from it (Downey & Fenton, 2003;Kluge &Negt, 2016). The notion of the counter-public sphere helps us better understand the increasingly important role of citizen journalism today.…”
Section: Media Landscape and The Public Sphere Of South Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a highly pluralistic public sphere. Many online communities, as well as sub-and counter-cultures that could not have proper place and role in the public communication realm dominated by the corporate mass media in the offline world have emerged and expanded on the Internet ignoring state and social boundaries [ 1,7,8,10,19,20]. This research attempts to study the political culture of the common, ordinary people, of the laymen, who are not professional politicians but nonetheless are active in civic terms online and often offline too.…”
Section: The Virtual Public Sphere As a Space For Democratic Communicmentioning
confidence: 99%