It has been indeed demonstrated that native SRIF inhibits secretion and proliferation of both normal and neoplasic pituitary cells by inducing several intracellular pathways, depending on receptor subtype and target tissue (Ferjoux et al. 2000). Therefore, many studies subsequently explored SSTR subtype expression in pituitary adenomas, demonstrating that SSTR2 is the most frequently expressed subtype (Panetta and Patel, 1995 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 3 SSTR 2 and 5 mRNA were always expressed, while SSTR1 and 3 mRNA were expressed in 11 and 12 tumors, respectively. Primary cultures deriving from these tumors were tested with 1 M SRIF or lanreotide (Lan), a SRIF analog preferentially binding with high affinity SSTR2 and less affinity SSTR5, or with SSTR2-and SSTR5-selective analogs. After 24 hours no effect was observed in some cultures, but in others (as well as in the GH3 rat cell line) a parallel reduction in cell viability and DNA synthesis was observed. This study also highlighted a dissociation between the in vitro effects of SRIF analogs on tumor cell proliferation and on GH secretion. In nearly 60% of the tumors, treatment with SRIF, Lan, SSTR2-or SSTR5-selective agonists significantly inhibited GH secretion.by a median of 33%. However, not all these primary cultures responded to SRIF and its analogs in terms of cell viability reduction, suggesting that inhibition of cell proliferation occurs independently of the effects on GH secretion (Danila et al. 2001). Similarly, an important tumor shrinkage has been described in an acromegalic patient during primary therapy with SRIF analogs, in the absence of hormonal normalization . In this case, the lack of antisecretory action of octreotide, a SRIF analog preferentially binding with high affinity SSTR2 and less affinity SSTR5, was in keeping with the absence of SSTR2 and SSTR5 expression by the tumor, which expressed almost exclusively SSTR3. The latter SSTR subtype has been indeed demonstrated to transduce important antiproliferative signals, since its activation causes apoptosis in heterlogous expression systems (Sharma et al. 1996). Further support to the hypothesis that antiproliferative effects are independent of antisecretory actions of SRIF analogs is provided by a recent report, describing the case of an acromegalic patient displaying dramatic tumor shrinkage during primary therapy with octreotide, without hormonal normalization. Again, in vitro SRIF and its analogs at 10 nM induced a scant antisecretory effect, but potently inhibited thymidine incorporation. This effect was evident for compounds interacting with SSTR5, in keeping with the finding that SSTR5 expression levels were greater than SSTR2 in the tissue (Resmini et al. 2007). In light of the recent discoveries concerning SSTR biology, we attempted to clarify the possible functional interaction between SSTR and dopamine (DA) receptor subtype 2 (DR2). To this aim, we investigated DR2 and SSTR2 and 5 expression in 25 GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, which were tested in primary culture...