2004
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.21.001082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New method for nonparaxial beam propagation

Abstract: This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, by writing Eqs. (2) and (4) at the collocation points j x and carrying out some algebraic manipulations (see, e.g., [6,7,13] for details), we can transform the partial differential equation (2) to the following ordinary differential equation for the matrix { : ( ),…”
Section: Collocation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, by writing Eqs. (2) and (4) at the collocation points j x and carrying out some algebraic manipulations (see, e.g., [6,7,13] for details), we can transform the partial differential equation (2) to the following ordinary differential equation for the matrix { : ( ),…”
Section: Collocation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the expansion functions defined in Eq. (5), this diagonal matrix reduces to a number and we have [13] 1 T…”
Section: Collocation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we have proposed a new method . [10] based on symmetrized splitting of the operator for non-paraxial propagation using the collocation method [11]. In this paper, we show that the splitstep non-paraxial scheme can be implemented efficiently in the finite-difference based propagation method without resorting to the paraxial approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As a measure of accuracy, we computed the overlap integral and an error (ERR), which includes the effects of both the dissipation in power as well as the loss of shape of the propagating mode [10]. We have used 900 computation points for this calculation.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other numerical methods used to model the distribution of beams also have their drawbacks. For example, calculations based on a parabolic approximation impose limitations on the allowed deviations [19] and do not always effectively describe multiple reflection of the wavepacket [20]. Let us examine two limiting cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%