New Method of Criteria Weighting for Supplier Selection

Ristono, Agus

doi:10.18551/rjoas.2019-03.42

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each criterion must be compared with the other criteria, without being left behind [1]. So, if there are n criteria, then one criterion must be compared with the other criteria n-1 times.…”

Section: Supplier Selection 21 Weighting Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Usually, those who make comparisons between these criteria are professional experts who are competent in the problem of being studied or decision-makers in a company [3]. The value given by the expert or decision maker when making the comparison is in the value range 1 to 9 [1]. Each value has a different meaning according to its level of importance.…”

Section: Supplier Selection 21 Weighting Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If there are n criteria, a pairwise comparison matrix of n x n will be formed. The pairwise comparison matrix can be seen in equation (1) [14].…”

Section: 0mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Proper supplier selection based on several criteria considered is one of the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods [1]. One of the MCDM methods that are often used in supplier selection is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) because it is considered quite effective [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From the background that has been described above, this study will develop a way of assessing and selecting valid suppliers without having to repeat. Specific research objectives are formulated as follows: (1) The supplier selection algorithm is following the criteria and assessment of the company, (2) The supplier assessment uses the proposed algorithm by utilizing the Hamilton chain principles so that the results are always valid.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Proposed Method for Supplier Selection

Ristono

Wahyuningsih

Junianto

2020

TSSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is frequent in supplier selection. First, AHP is a pairwise comparison between criteria. If the pairwise comparisons are inconsistent, the result is invalid. Thus, the process of comparing criteria must be repeated continuously until valid results are obtained. This process takes time and costs so it is considered inefficient. This research proposes the application of the Hamilton chain process into the pairwise comparison matrix. One criterion is symbolized as a knot, while the arc is symbolized as the pairwise comparison value between the two nodes or the connected criterion. In the network model of the AHP method, each node is connected to all other nodes without exception. Whereas in the proposed method, each criterion or node is compared only once. That said, avoiding inconsistencies can be made. The consistency ratio result of the proposed method is found to be consistent

show abstract

“…Each criterion must be compared with the other criteria, without being left behind [1]. So, if there are n criteria, then one criterion must be compared with the other criteria n-1 times.…”

Section: Supplier Selection 21 Weighting Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Supplier Selection 21 Weighting Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If there are n criteria, a pairwise comparison matrix of n x n will be formed. The pairwise comparison matrix can be seen in equation (1) [14].…”

Section: 0mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Proposed Method for Supplier Selection

Ristono

Wahyuningsih

Junianto

2020

TSSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Selection of the Best Supplier Criteria with the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method in the Construction Services Industry

Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The progress of the industry causes a lot of competition in various industrial circles, especially in construction services. There are many types of competition in the construction service industry, this requires construction service actors to make improvements. One of the strategies in competing in the industrial world is to maintain the best quality and provide innovation in increasing the procurement of raw materials. This study aims to analyze the criteria that are the company's priorities in choosing iron plate suppliers for fabrication needs. One of the methods used in this research is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The problem solved is multi-objective and multi-criteria based on the comparison of preferences of each element in the hierarchy. This research involves experts who are used as respondents to consider decisions. The results of the study show that the Price criteria is still the most important criterion with a weight of (0.352), followed by Quality criteria with a weight of (0.277), Service criteria with a weight of (0.143), Flexibility criteria with a weight of (0.114), and Delivery criteria with a weight of (0.113).

show abstract

The application of factor analysis (FA) in evaluating supplier selection criteria in PT. Wijaya Karya Beton Tbk and ranking suppliers using integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and adaptive ratio assessment (ARAS)

Wahyuningsih¹,

Ristono²,

Muhsin³

2022

Technium

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The selection of a concrete iron supplier is critical for a long-term supply chain in the infrastructure industry. Due to the participation of various qualitative and quantitative elements, the evaluation process of concrete iron supplier selection is a difficult work for decision specialists. Because uncertainty is widespread in concrete iron supplier selection challenges, improving integrated criteria selection and supplier selection procedures has proven to be one of the most efficient and superior ways to represent practical difficulties. The current study presents a novel framework for evaluating and selecting a preferred concrete iron supplier based on Factor Analysis and the ARAS (Adaptive Ratio Assessment) method, as well as the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) methodology. An enhanced technique is used in the proposed method to determine the criteria weights based on expert preferences. Next, an actual case study of the concrete iron supplier selection problem is conducted in a comprehensive setting to demonstrate the effectiveness and practicability of the suggested methodology. A sensitivity analysis is also undertaken to ensure that the stated methodology is stable. Finally, the strength of the resulting result is tested by comparing it to current methodologies. The final results show that the established framework is more consistent and powerful than other approaches already in use.

show abstract

New Method of Criteria Weighting for Supplier Selection

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

Proposed Method for Supplier Selection

Proposed Method for Supplier Selection

Selection of the Best Supplier Criteria with the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method in the Construction Services Industry

The application of factor analysis (FA) in evaluating supplier selection criteria in PT. Wijaya Karya Beton Tbk and ranking suppliers using integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and adaptive ratio assessment (ARAS)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About