2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12289-009-0395-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New method to characterize a machining system: application in turning

Abstract: Many studies simulates the machining process by using a single degree of freedom spring-mass sytem to model the tool stiffness, or the workpiece stiffness, or the unit tool-workpiece stiffness in modelings 2D. Others impose the tool action, or use more or less complex modelings of the efforts applied by the tool taking account the tool geometry. Thus, all these models remain two-dimensional or sometimes partially three-dimensional. This paper aims at developing an experimental method allowing to determine accu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stiffness matrix k is given in another work [7]. Accordingly numerical models were obtained the results for the first twelve natural frequencies of these two models (represented in the figure 13 and 14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness matrix k is given in another work [7]. Accordingly numerical models were obtained the results for the first twelve natural frequencies of these two models (represented in the figure 13 and 14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, under a load P = 1,000 N, for material having a Young modulus E = 21×10 5 N/mm 2 , the workpiece dimensions selected are: D 1 = 60 mm (diameter), L 1 = 180 mm (length), for a bending stiffness of 7×10 7 N/m ( Fig. 2) [15]. These values are within the higher limit of the stiffness zone acceptable for a conventional lathe [16], [17], [18].…”
Section: Experimental Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Usually, it is the fundamental mode (at low frequency) that predominates. 4 In practice, the jerk control method proves to be a suboptimal solution to vibration reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%