2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.34974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Method to Predict Nonlinear Roll Damping Moments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The roll dynamics of rockets are well known to be over damped [ 10 , 11 , 13 ] and thus they can be modelled as a first-order differential equation [ 10 ]. The solution to a step response of a first-order system can be approximated as a bi-linear model, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The roll dynamics of rockets are well known to be over damped [ 10 , 11 , 13 ] and thus they can be modelled as a first-order differential equation [ 10 ]. The solution to a step response of a first-order system can be approximated as a bi-linear model, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is to use a minimal mathematical modelling approach [ 6 – 9 ] to describe the overall effect of complex dynamics on the inertia, damping and non-linear spring dynamics of the pitch, yaw, and roll axes of the rocket. For example, it is known that aerodynamic drag changes in each axis as a function of speed [ 10 12 ], and there are also changes in mass and inertia in each axis dueto centre of mass and pressure changes over time [ 10 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6), accurate enough at low angles of attack, is replaced in Eq. (8) by the experimental or calculated wingalone normal-force coefficient C Nw at the angle of attack .…”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the true aim of this work is the nonlinear roll derivatives of cruciform configurations, for which only the wing-normal-force components in the presence of the body are relevant. In addition, the theoretical methods to predict the roll derivatives are very limited (see the exhaustive survey made by Moore and Moore [6] concerning the rolldamping coefficient). Also, Magnus force will be addressed in Sec.…”
Section: Wing-normal Force In the Presence Of The Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present method predicts a similar behavior at any Mach number, as long as C N2 is positive and C N4 negative (AR 2). Figure 10b presents the comparison between the roll-damping coefficient estimates and the experimental values given in [6] for the basic finner at two supersonic Mach numbers. The AP05 code [13] was used to set the value of C N0 .…”
Section: Nonlinear Rolling Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%