2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New methodology in infant operant kicking procedures: computerized stimulus control and computerized measurement of kicking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach offers an additional dependent measure, beyond the typical looking-time data that have been the primary source of information regarding this issue in the literature to date, with which to assess infants' object perception abilities. As a corollary, the present results demonstrate that, as reported by Kraebel et al (2004), the computerized mobile apparatus is an effective adaptation of the classical apparatus (Rovee & Rovee, 1969), and produces good learning and retention of a mobile displayed during the training period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach offers an additional dependent measure, beyond the typical looking-time data that have been the primary source of information regarding this issue in the literature to date, with which to assess infants' object perception abilities. As a corollary, the present results demonstrate that, as reported by Kraebel et al (2004), the computerized mobile apparatus is an effective adaptation of the classical apparatus (Rovee & Rovee, 1969), and produces good learning and retention of a mobile displayed during the training period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A third group was tested with the same novel view, but following a shorter retention interval (group View-Change-1 hr), and a fourth group was tested with a different simple shape (group Shape-Change; e.g., trained with cylinder and tested with brick). A computerized mobile apparatus was employed for operant training and testing (see Kraebel, Fable, & Gerhardstein, 2004 for a detailed description of the apparatus).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The design of this experiment was to expose infants to an elastic yoke between the legs (or no yoke in controls) during two consecutive baseline periods, then to provide reinforcement to experimental subjects by attaching a ribbon between one leg and an overhead mobile during five acquisition trials. Infants quickly learned to kick more frequently and more vigorously to cause the mobile to move, an effect that has been extensively explored by Rovee-Collier and other developmental researchers interested in infant memory (Kraebel, Fable, & Gerhardstein, 2004;Rovee & Rovee, 1969;Rovee-Collier, Hayne, & Colombo, 2001;Rovee-Collier, Morrongiello, Aron, & Kupersmidt, 1978). In the Thelen study, infants that experienced the interlimb yoke learned to kick both legs in a conjugate pattern, thereby moving the mobile more vigorously (Thelen, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ejemplo Kraebel, Fable y Gerhardstein (2004) entrenaron a un grupo de bebés de entre 2 a 3 meses de edad en una prueba en la que el pataleo era contingente con el movimiento de un móvil que el niño observaba. Hallaron que la tasa de la respuesta se incrementaba significativamente en contraposición con un grupo no contingente, en que el pataleo no producía el movimiento del móvil.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified