Day 4 Wed, October 18, 2017 2017
DOI: 10.2118/187598-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Methodology to Evaluate the Performance of Chemical Sealant Loss Circulation Materials

Abstract: A new laboratory work procedure has been developed to evaluate and test the performance and effectiveness of chemical-sealant-based loss circulation materials (CS-LCMs), which are often used in cases of severe-to-total losses. These unconventional testing methods should be useful tools to evaluate the integrity of loss circulation material (LCM) products under downhole conditions in terms of differential pressure buildup and how quickly such LCMs can arrest lost circulation. Evaluation and testi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the sealing performance of OAP, four distinctive tests including HTHP filtration (including both static and dynamic filtration) using API filter paper as the filtration medium to simulate the permeable formation [ 42 ]; a permeability plugging test using ceramic disk as filtration medium to determine the ability of particles in the drilling fluid to bridge pores [ 43 ]; a sand bed filtration test using a sand bed as filtration medium to simulate an unconsolidated formation; and a fracture sealing test using wedged and slotted stainless steel as filtration medium to simulate a fractured formation were carried out [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the sealing performance of OAP, four distinctive tests including HTHP filtration (including both static and dynamic filtration) using API filter paper as the filtration medium to simulate the permeable formation [ 42 ]; a permeability plugging test using ceramic disk as filtration medium to determine the ability of particles in the drilling fluid to bridge pores [ 43 ]; a sand bed filtration test using a sand bed as filtration medium to simulate an unconsolidated formation; and a fracture sealing test using wedged and slotted stainless steel as filtration medium to simulate a fractured formation were carried out [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of oil-based mud have been investigated in the past, especially to understand how the composition and chemistry of OBF affect cement performance [18]. One of the most common pieces of equipment used for cement mechanical properties is the Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer (UCA), which is a great instrument for describing the cement strength evolution [19][20][21][22][23][24]. For example, in 1993, Harder et al [18] carried out laboratory experiments on 17 ppg density Class H Portland cement consisting of fluid loss additives and friction reducers designed for 200 • F. The cement slurry was contaminated (10%, 20%, 30%) with four different types of OBF, which were prepared in the lab with combinations of two base oils (diesel and mineral oil) and two emulsifiers (standard fatty acid and alkanolamide) as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%