2019
DOI: 10.31550/1727-2378-2019-165-10-57-62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Methods for Detecting Antiphospholipid Antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of recurrence of thrombosis in relation to the OR was 2 or more times higher compared to ELISA [for IgG aCL (OR = 21.00 vs. OR = 10.33, respectively) and for IgG anti-β 2 -GPI (OR = 32.00 vs. OR = 7.50, respectively)]. Higher OR in aPL studies by ELISA is most likely related to their more frequent detection by CLA compared to ELISA [14]. This is due to the advantage of the CLA method in high analytical sensitivity and performance, a wide range of detectable concentrations while maintaining high accuracy in any part of the calibration curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The risk of recurrence of thrombosis in relation to the OR was 2 or more times higher compared to ELISA [for IgG aCL (OR = 21.00 vs. OR = 10.33, respectively) and for IgG anti-β 2 -GPI (OR = 32.00 vs. OR = 7.50, respectively)]. Higher OR in aPL studies by ELISA is most likely related to their more frequent detection by CLA compared to ELISA [14]. This is due to the advantage of the CLA method in high analytical sensitivity and performance, a wide range of detectable concentrations while maintaining high accuracy in any part of the calibration curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%