2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New methods for the geometrical analysis of tubular organs

Abstract: This paper presents new methods to study the shape of tubular organs. Determining precise cross-sections is of major importance to perform geometrical measurements, such as diameter, wall-thickness estimation or area measurement. Our first contribution is a robust method to estimate orthogonal planes based on the Voronoi Covariance Measure. Our method is not relying on a curve-skeleton computation beforehand. This means our orthogonal plane estimator can be used either on the skeleton or on the volume. Another… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deletion of such short junctions is a commonly described issue when working with skeletons (e.g. Barry, Chan, & Williams, ; Grélard et al, ). To delete such junctions, geodesic distance transform (MATLAB function “bwdistgeodesic”) was used, which can measure the distance between a pair of voxels obtained by traversing only the foreground voxels.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deletion of such short junctions is a commonly described issue when working with skeletons (e.g. Barry, Chan, & Williams, ; Grélard et al, ). To delete such junctions, geodesic distance transform (MATLAB function “bwdistgeodesic”) was used, which can measure the distance between a pair of voxels obtained by traversing only the foreground voxels.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,b). The deletion of such short junctions is a commonly described issue when working with skeletons (e.g Barry, Chan, & Williams, 2009;Grélard et al, 2017)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each path we corrected for the discretization error -a process known as re-centring. 24 We implemented a similar method to that described by Irving et al 30 A five point smoothing was performed along each path. We modelled the centreline as a continuous model by fitting a cubic spline F : [0, k n ] → R 3 denoted as…”
Section: Recentring and Spline Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centreline was corrected for any discretization errors, a process known as re-centring. 15 In this study, a five-point smoothing approach was adopted on each point on the centreline. Next, we require a continuous model to compute the tangent along the airway.…”
Section: Centrelinementioning
confidence: 99%