1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-5316(96)00055-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New models for pseudo self-similar traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
53
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate modeling of IP traffic requires matching closely not only the packet arrival process but also the packet size distribution. Surprisingly, while the arrival process has received considerable attention [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], very few works have addressed the packet size distribution and, more so, its joint characterization with the arrival process [11,12]. However, as it will be made clear in this paper, a joint characterization is required for accurate prediction of the queuing behavior (i.e., the packet loss ratio or average packet delay observed in a queuing system).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate modeling of IP traffic requires matching closely not only the packet arrival process but also the packet size distribution. Surprisingly, while the arrival process has received considerable attention [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], very few works have addressed the packet size distribution and, more so, its joint characterization with the arrival process [11,12]. However, as it will be made clear in this paper, a joint characterization is required for accurate prediction of the queuing behavior (i.e., the packet loss ratio or average packet delay observed in a queuing system).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the channel occupancy (PU behavior), we use the model proposed in [35], which is shown to exhibit a selfsimilar behavior over a finite but wide enough range of time-scales. Thus the block-matrices in (1) are given as, Tables 2 and 3 show the settings of a basic scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field studies done on the sojourn time of idle and busy times have shown that this assumption of exponentially distributed sojourn times of channel states cannot be taken for granted [38]. Therefore to find the closest match for the sojourn times a distribution fitting must be done and due to the fact that most data networks have self similarity none of the above discussed models will be close enough approximations [39].…”
Section: Prediction Of Channel Status Using An Assumed Channel Usage mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the simulation purpose we developed the Markovian arrival process as given in [39,45]. That particular…”
Section: Creating the Training Sequence Using The Markovian Arrival Pmentioning
confidence: 99%