2011
DOI: 10.1029/2011je003827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New near-IR observations of mesospheric CO2and H2O clouds on Mars

Abstract: [1] Carbon dioxide clouds, which are speculated by models on solar and extra-solar planets, have been recently observed near the equator of Mars. The most comprehensive identification of Martian CO 2 ice clouds has been obtained by the near-IR imaging spectrometer OMEGA. CRISM, a similar instrument with a higher spatial resolution, cannot detect these clouds with the same method due to its shorter wavelength range. Here we present a new method to detect CO 2 clouds using near-IR data based on the comparison of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
91
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
10
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11 shows the vertical profiles of kext at 3.4 normalμ m (i.e., the opacity per km). As 3.4 normalμ m is on the edge of the 3‐ normalμ m water ice band (Vincendon et al, ), it provides an estimator of the global atmospheric opacity, whereas the opacity at 3.2 normalμ m is strongly increased by the presence of water ice clouds. We observe that the water ice cloud opacity at 3.2 normalμm (vertically integrated along the cloud) typically goes from 0.01 to 0.05 before the GDS but falls to a few 103 for the mesospheric clouds during the GDS, with kextfalse(λ=3.2.3emnormalμnormalmfalse)104.3emkm1 around 90 km (and kext.3emfalse(λ=3.4.3emnormalμnormalmfalse)105.3emkm1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 11 shows the vertical profiles of kext at 3.4 normalμ m (i.e., the opacity per km). As 3.4 normalμ m is on the edge of the 3‐ normalμ m water ice band (Vincendon et al, ), it provides an estimator of the global atmospheric opacity, whereas the opacity at 3.2 normalμ m is strongly increased by the presence of water ice clouds. We observe that the water ice cloud opacity at 3.2 normalμm (vertically integrated along the cloud) typically goes from 0.01 to 0.05 before the GDS but falls to a few 103 for the mesospheric clouds during the GDS, with kextfalse(λ=3.2.3emnormalμnormalmfalse)104.3emkm1 around 90 km (and kext.3emfalse(λ=3.4.3emnormalμnormalmfalse)105.3emkm1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These high‐altitude water ice clouds are observed only at the beginning of the GDS. High‐altitude water ice clouds can also be seen during non‐dust GDS years, when they occur during the storm season (Clancy et al, ; Vincendon et al, ). However, high‐cloud altitudes are nearly systematic in our observations during the peak phase of the GDS (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, water ice clouds are frequently observed in the middle atmosphere of Mars (Guzewich et al, 2013;Vincendon et al, 2011) with temperatures commonly falling below 160 K (Maltagliati et al, 2011). In the terrestrial atmosphere, noctilucent clouds form at the high-latitude summer mesopause (Rapp and Lübken, 2004) with temperatures falling to 120 K on average (Lübken et al, 2009) with extremes down to 100 K (Rapp et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of discrete ordinates and Legendre coefficients has been chosen as a compromise between calculation time and accuracy of the model (8 for zenith angles and 16 for azimuth angles). The optically thin CO 2 clouds are formed in the cold mesospheric conditions mostly at low latitudes near the northern spring and summer (Vincendon et al, 2011). The observed optical depth of the clouds is below 0.2 and they were not included in our radiative-transfer model.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Direct Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%