2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.06.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New neutron-rich isotope production in 154 Sm+ 160 Gd

Abstract: Deep inelastic scattering in 154 Sm+ 160 Gd at energies above the Bass barrier is for the first time investigated with two different microscopic dynamics approaches: improved quantum molecular dynamics (ImQMD) model and time dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) theory. No fusion is observed from both models. The capture pocket disappears for this reaction due to strong Coulomb repulsion and the contact time of the di-nuclear system formed in head-on collisions is about 700 fm/c at an incident energy of 440 MeV. The i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a bunch of models developed so far for the MNT study, such as the semi-classical model, like GRAZING [122,[205][206][207][208][209][210] or CWKB [117][118][119]211], the dinuclear system (DNS) model [212][213][214][215][216][217][218][219][220][221][222][223][224][225][226], the improved quantum molecular dynamics (ImQMD) model [227][228][229][230], and the Langevin model [131-140, 231, 232]. There are pros and cons in those approaches.…”
Section: E Remarks On Other Theoretical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a bunch of models developed so far for the MNT study, such as the semi-classical model, like GRAZING [122,[205][206][207][208][209][210] or CWKB [117][118][119]211], the dinuclear system (DNS) model [212][213][214][215][216][217][218][219][220][221][222][223][224][225][226], the improved quantum molecular dynamics (ImQMD) model [227][228][229][230], and the Langevin model [131-140, 231, 232]. There are pros and cons in those approaches.…”
Section: E Remarks On Other Theoretical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of theoretical approaches have been developed that describe the quasifission in terms of multi-nucleon transfer (MNT) processes [41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Recently, time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) theory have proven to be an excellent tool for studying QF dynamics, and in particular mass-angle distributions and final fragment total kinetic energies (TKE) [48,31,37,49,32,50,51,52,34,53,45,54,55,56]. While the fragments produced in TDHF studies are the excited primary fragments [57] a number of extensions based on the use of Langevin dynamics have been successfully applied to de-excite these fragments [55,58,59,56,60] Theoretical studies of quasifission dynamics have taught us that dynamics themselves may be dominated by shell effects [61,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes classical methods such as a transport model [34], the dinuclear system model [35][36][37][38], and models based on the Langevin equation [39][40][41][42][43]. Microscopic approaches such as quantum molecular dynamics [44][45][46] and the time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) theory [17,18,32,43,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] have also been used. See [58][59][60][61] for recent reviews on TDHF.An advantage of microscopic calculations is that their only inputs are the parameters of the energy density functional describing the interaction between the nucleons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%