1998
DOI: 10.1128/aem.64.12.5067-5067.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Nitrogen-Fixing Microorganisms Detected in Oligotrophic Oceans by Amplification of Nitrogenase ( nifH ) Genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RNA extracts were treated with ezDNase™ and converted into cDNA using the SuperScript ® IV First Strand Synthesis System with ezDNase™ enzyme kit (Invitrogen) following the recommendation of the supplier. Nested PCR amplification of nifH genes from cDNA sample and full control (i.e., sample following extraction, cDNA conversion, and amplification) were conducted in triplicate (with one negative PCR control) according to the modified protocol of Zehr et al., 1998 from Jayakumar et al., 2017. Amplification was verified by gel electrophoresis and cDNA amplicons were pooled and sent with total DNA extracts for nifH and 16S rRNA gene sequencing using bTEFAP ® and Illumina MiSeq300 at the MRDNA ® facility (Shallowater, TX, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA extracts were treated with ezDNase™ and converted into cDNA using the SuperScript ® IV First Strand Synthesis System with ezDNase™ enzyme kit (Invitrogen) following the recommendation of the supplier. Nested PCR amplification of nifH genes from cDNA sample and full control (i.e., sample following extraction, cDNA conversion, and amplification) were conducted in triplicate (with one negative PCR control) according to the modified protocol of Zehr et al., 1998 from Jayakumar et al., 2017. Amplification was verified by gel electrophoresis and cDNA amplicons were pooled and sent with total DNA extracts for nifH and 16S rRNA gene sequencing using bTEFAP ® and Illumina MiSeq300 at the MRDNA ® facility (Shallowater, TX, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the cyanobacteria, i.e., Trichodesmium, has been traditionally considered the most dominant diazotrophic genus, but it is now clear that marine diazotrophs are more diverse. Non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs which are not constrained by light may also conduct N 2 fixation below the twilight zone (Zehr et al 1998, Riemann et al 2010, Luo et al 2012. They can be detected in a wide range of environments such as nutrient-rich, cold, temperate zones, and the dark and deep oceans (Benavides et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity of marine diazotrophs has long been thought to be restricted to members of the phylum Cyanobacteria . However, culture-independent approaches, like those targeting the nifH gene or metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses from various oceanic samples demonstrated the presence in abundance of non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs (NCD, (Zehr et al, 1998; Delmont et al, 2018; Farnelid et al, 2019; Geisler et al, 2019; Kapili et al, 2020; Delmont et al, 2022)). Despite these observations, few marine NCD have been brought to culture (Farnelid et al, 2014; Martinez-Perez et al, 2018), hampering in depth understanding of their ecophysiology and contribution to global N budget in oceans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More and more evidence show the presence in all oceans of previously overlooked nitrogen-fixers, not affiliated to the phylum Cyanobacteria . Indeed, culture-independent approaches based on the amplification or immunodetection of the nifH gene, a gene encoding a subunit of the nitrogenase, conserved among diazotrophs and considered as a biomarker for diazotrophy, have demonstrated the presence of marine Non-Cyanobacterial Diazotrophs (NCDs) (Zehr et al, 1998) in the water column attached to particles (undefined aggregates, faecal pellets) (Farnelid et al, 2019; Geisler et al, 2019) and in deep sea sediments (Kapili et al, 2020). Moreover, Tara Oceans expeditions provide metagenomic data from diverse oceanic locations, depths and size fractions, coupled with physical and chemical information (Karsenti et al, 2011; Planes et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%