2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00026-017-0346-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Non-existence Proofs for Ovoids of Hermitian Polar Spaces and Hyperbolic Quadrics

Abstract: We provide new proofs for the non-existence of ovoids in hyperbolic spaces of rank at least four in even characteristic, and for the Hermitian polar space H(5, 4). We also improve the results of A. Klein on the non-existence of ovoids of Hermitian spaces and hyperbolic quadrics. (2010). Primary 05B25, 51E20, 51A50. Mathematics Subject Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can see that a function µ satisfying the condition of Lemma 2.3 generalizes the notion of tight sets. The proof of the following lemma justifies this by showing that µ is a weighted tight set [1] and, moreover, given such a function µ one can construct a weighted set for hyperbolic quadrics of smaller rank. Lemma 2.4.…”
Section: The Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…One can see that a function µ satisfying the condition of Lemma 2.3 generalizes the notion of tight sets. The proof of the following lemma justifies this by showing that µ is a weighted tight set [1] and, moreover, given such a function µ one can construct a weighted set for hyperbolic quadrics of smaller rank. Lemma 2.4.…”
Section: The Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Our hope is that the discovery of low degree Boolean functions will help with deciding the existence of small designs. In principle, this is a feasible approach, which was investigated by the first and third author for slightly different, but also graphs derived from finite geometries in [1].…”
Section: Designs and Their Q-analogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. (Proposition 1) As in [1], write C n = j ⊥ V + ⊥ V − . and let E + and E − be the non-principal idempotents corresponding to V + and V − .…”
Section: (): V-volmentioning
confidence: 99%