2016
DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2016.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sites in the eastern Aegean: the Karaburun Archaeological Survey Project

Abstract: Despite ongoing fieldwork focusing on the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic periods of the Aegean, the eastern part of this region, especially western Turkey, remains almost entirely unexplored in terms of early prehistory. There is virtually no evidence from this area that can contribute to broader research themes such as the dispersal of early hominins, the distribution of Early Holocene foragers and early forager-farmer interactions. The primary aim of the Karaburun Archaeological Survey Project is to address thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these groups presents continuity during the transition from foraging to farming, and admixture only happened to significant levels later during the Copper and Bronze Age 38 , 39 . Whilst the SPDs for western Anatolia and the Aegean basin are difficult to interpret given the small sample size, it is clear the diffusion of farming across this area happens relatively quickly during the first half of the 9 th millenium cal BP 40 42 , and upon a background of limited preceding Mesolithic population 43 . This process exhibits regional variation, for instance in terms of stock-breeding strategies 44 , but from a population point of view, the picture looks different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these groups presents continuity during the transition from foraging to farming, and admixture only happened to significant levels later during the Copper and Bronze Age 38 , 39 . Whilst the SPDs for western Anatolia and the Aegean basin are difficult to interpret given the small sample size, it is clear the diffusion of farming across this area happens relatively quickly during the first half of the 9 th millenium cal BP 40 42 , and upon a background of limited preceding Mesolithic population 43 . This process exhibits regional variation, for instance in terms of stock-breeding strategies 44 , but from a population point of view, the picture looks different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recurrent field surveys in the Aegean have increased significantly the number of late Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sites known from this area (see Fig 1A and 1B ) the number of excavations remains comparatively low (see recent overviews by Sampson [ 5 ] and Çilingiroğlu et al [ 6 ]). Additionally, in the southern Aegean most late Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sites sampled for archaeobotanical remains have produced scanty non-wood but more abundant wood charcoal macro-remains [ 7 – 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Naxos was insular for at least some of the Middle Paleolithic, indirect evidence from elsewhere in Greece argues that Neanderthals were capable of short-distance waterborne crossings ( 42 ). Moreover, recent discoveries of putatively Lower Paleolithic material from western Anatolia’s Karaburun peninsula (currently undated) ( 43 ) and the nearby island of Lesbos (continental at the time), dated to 164 ± 33 and 258 ± 48 ka ago ( 41 ), indicate the presence of nearby populations that might have entered the Aegean Basin from the east (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%