2004
DOI: 10.1029/2004jb003127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, and petrographic results from the Valle Group, Baja California, Mexico: Exploring the causes of anomalously shallow paleomagnetic inclinations

Abstract: [1] A detailed paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, and sedimentologic study was conducted on Cenomanian-age strata of the Valle Group at El Campito, Baja California, to examine the burial compaction effects on the paleomagnetic inclination of marine sedimentary rocks. Alternating field and thermal demagnetization isolated a characteristic remanence at 16 of 18 sites with a mean of Dec = 342.6°, Inc = 19.1°, and a 95 = 3.4°. The inclination is 38.7°shallower than that predicted by the reference paleopole for North Am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(154 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important result of our study is the depositional control on inclination shallowing. Overall, we observe a shallowing factor of ∼0.43 [f factor defined using King's (1955) equation], which means that these sedimentary rocks have undergone significantly more flattening than most of the reported magnetite-bearing sedimentary rocks with f factors ranging from 0.56 to 0.79 (Kodama & Davi 1995;Kodama 1997Kodama , 2009Tan & Kodama 1998;Kim & Kodama 2004;Li et al 2004;Vaughn et al 2005;Bilardello & Kodama 2010a). It is becoming increasingly common to assume a flattening factor and apply a blanket (or even 'ad hoc') correction using f factors of ∼0.6 (Kent & Irving 2010;Domeier et al 2011).…”
Section: C O N C L U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…An important result of our study is the depositional control on inclination shallowing. Overall, we observe a shallowing factor of ∼0.43 [f factor defined using King's (1955) equation], which means that these sedimentary rocks have undergone significantly more flattening than most of the reported magnetite-bearing sedimentary rocks with f factors ranging from 0.56 to 0.79 (Kodama & Davi 1995;Kodama 1997Kodama , 2009Tan & Kodama 1998;Kim & Kodama 2004;Li et al 2004;Vaughn et al 2005;Bilardello & Kodama 2010a). It is becoming increasingly common to assume a flattening factor and apply a blanket (or even 'ad hoc') correction using f factors of ∼0.6 (Kent & Irving 2010;Domeier et al 2011).…”
Section: C O N C L U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The IRM of a sample is acquired by exposing the sample to a 1.0 T field using an ASC impulse magnetizer. The detailed magnetic measurements of the lake sediments can be found in Li (2005).…”
Section: Study Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several workers have noted that sedimentary units may have been affected by inclination shallowing (Butler et al 1991;Kodama and Ward 2001;Li et al 2004;Vaugh et al 2005). Examples include rocks from the Jurassic Eugenia Formation and Upper Cretaceous Valle Formation in the Vizcaíno peninsula that were previously used to support palaeomagnetic reconstructions requiring large northward displacement (Hagstrum et al 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%