New paradigms for engineering education

Abstract

A paradigm shift is taking place in engineering education, driven by ABET, changing expectations of employers, the rapidly changing state-of-the-art of pedagogy, and many other forces. Minor modifcations in current teaching practices will not solve the current problems. Teaching success in today's world requires a new approach to instruction. This article starts by summarizing the paradigm we're leaving behind at various rates in colleges and universities across the country. We then present our take on the paradigm we're entering into, explore implications of the changing paradigm for students and faculty, and close by offering some suggestions for fostering change. The aim of this article is to stimulate thinking about the changing nature of engineering education and to encourage the reader to engage in reflection and conversation.

Online Finite Element Tutorials as Active Learning Tools

“…For example, if the MBTI-introverts are found to benefit more from the ALM than the MBTI-extroverts, then additional collaborative learning (which tends to energize the extroverts) could be added to the ALM. [13], which include conducting assessments in various forms to summarize the impact of active learning methods.…”

Learning Statics by Feeling: Effects of Everyday Examples on Confidence and Identity Development

“…Active learning encompasses collaborative learning, a method in which students work together in small groups, cooperative learning, in which students pursue common goals while being assessed individually, and problem-based learning, in which relevant problems are used to provide context and motivation for learning 2 . Collaborative, cooperative, and problem-based learning are among the most thoroughly discussed active learning methods [2][3][4][5] .…”

On The Use Of Equation Solvers, Interactive Software, And Hands On Projects In Integrated Sophomore Engineering Courses

“…In 1994, the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) joined six other engineering programs from Arizona State University, Texas A&M University, University of Alabama, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Texas Women's University, and Maricopa Community College to form the National Science sponsored Foundation Coalition (FC). The coalition was one of eight NSF-supported engineering coalitions, which were the ECSEL, Synthesis, Gateway, SUCCEED, Greenfield, Academy, SCCEME, and the Foundation [1]. The main thrust of the FC was to implement curriculum reform in engineering education.…”