2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1194/1/012054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Pentagon Identities Revisited

Abstract: We present a new solution to the pentagon identity in terms of gamma function. We obtain this solution by taking the gamma function limit from the pentagon identity related to the three-dimesional index. This limit corresponds to the identification of the sphere partition function of dual theories and being equivalent to the star-triangle relation in statistical mechanics which corresponds to the "strongly coupled" regime of the Faddeev-Volkov model.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several pentagon identities in terms of Euler's gamma function [24,40,49]. Here we present the known pentagon relation [24] in terms of gamma function which we obtained in different manner 12 .…”
Section: Limit Of the Pentagon Identitymentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are several pentagon identities in terms of Euler's gamma function [24,40,49]. Here we present the known pentagon relation [24] in terms of gamma function which we obtained in different manner 12 .…”
Section: Limit Of the Pentagon Identitymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…There are several examples of integral pentagon relations computed via three-dimensional supersymmetric dualities, see, e.g. [24,[40][41][42][43][45][46][47]. Here we present a new pentagon identity in terms of hyperbolic gamma functions.…”
Section: Pentagon Identitymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such identities also play a role in the study of supersymmetric gauge theories, integrable models, knot theory, etc. (see some recent works [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%