New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: a systematic literature review

Gray, Morag; Crosta, Lucilla

doi:10.1080/0158037x.2018.1532405

Cited by 52 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…While quality supervision is acknowledged as key to research success, 43 our findings highlight the role of 'enculturation' and 'emancipation' previously identified as key to research supervision. 44 The attributes of quality supervisors in other contexts have been identified. 45 However, how supervisors of scholarly experience curricula can foster these mechanisms to further enhance outcomes warrants further exploration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A realist review of scholarly experiences in medical education

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decade, medical schools have been increasingly incorporating research methods and evidence-based medicine as part of their core teaching. 1 In addition to teaching research methods via coursework, numerous institutions have embraced scholarly experiences. 1,2 Globally, scholarly experiences differ between institutions and are often termed, scholarly placements, scholarly projects, scholarly intensives or scholarly concentrations. 1 We have used the term 'scholarly experiences', as an over-arching term to encompass the various terminologies used by different medical schools. These experiences aim to foster independent learning and develop

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A realist review of scholarly experiences in medical education

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As per the Lee, et al, (2020) empowerment is basically consist on the power and they suggested that there quite difference among the relation and internal motivation related concept of empowerment. It is the mix effect of employee emotional situation and positive behaviors of middle level management (Gray, & Crosta, 2019;Amundsen & Martinsen, 2015). Social concept of the empowerment gives the different view, whereas the empowerment is the understanding of inside power and control and particular skill to handle the environmental and social change effect on the life of own self (Grabe, & Dutt, 2019;Angwenyi, et al, 2019).…”

Section: Employee Empowermentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship of Employee Training, Employee Empowerment, Team Work With Job Satisfaction

Kayani

Mir

2020

jass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current research is designed to check the impact of employee training, employee empowerment, team work on job satisfaction. Employee training, employee empowerment, team work are independent variables and job satisfaction is dependent variable. Overall, 160 employees of banks employees who are working at managerial level are selected randomly. Results indicates that employee training, employee empowerment, team work has significant positive impact on job satisfaction. It is also seen that teamwork is emerging as strong predictor of job satisfaction the employee empowerment is second good predictor of job satisfaction. In future researches, this kind of researches will be also conducted in other kind of industries like hotel industry, telecom sector and education sector. In future researches some other potential predictors of job satisfaction like employee compensation, employee appraisal will also include. It is also better to include some better outcomes like employee loyalty and employee productivity for generalization.

show abstract

“…(Doloriert et al, 2012); what are good online doctoral supervisor-supervisee processes? (Gray & Crosta, 2018).…”

Section: Individualist Accounts Of Doctoral Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Usually, these are orientated to adopting the kinds of attitudes, behaviours and choices said to be characteristic of 'ideal' supervisors or doctoral researchers. Gray and Crosta's (2018) systematic review of the literature in this area is replete with such appeals for supervisors and supervisees to be better people. There are appeals to be more creative, more flexible, better communicators, more culturally aware.…”

Section: Individualist Accounts Of Doctoral Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Doctoral supervision: sharpening the focus of the practice lens

Trowler

2021

Higher Education Research & Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The literature on doctoral supervision is heavily informed by a focus on the individual and dyad, together with a self-help ethic of supervisory improvement. On the margins is a disparate literature taking a 'practice' perspective on doctoral supervision. But this literature is disconnected and lacking in some important features. This article's intention is to sharpen the focus and so to enhance the utility of a social practice theory lens. It refutes the idea that the practice perspective is inherently conservative, showing how a sharply focused lens can challenge assimilationism. The article first elaborates on the individualist approach and highlights differences with the practice approaches as already developed. It then sets out a social practice approach which builds on that existing literature. Finally, it applies this to the issue of colonialist assimilationism in doctoral supervision. The article is not directly based on empirical research, but instead uses existing literature to indicate ways in which a social practice approach might more effectively address the enhancement of doctoral supervision.

show abstract

New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: a systematic literature review

Cited by 52 publications

References 55 publications

A realist review of scholarly experiences in medical education

A realist review of scholarly experiences in medical education

Relationship of Employee Training, Employee Empowerment, Team Work With Job Satisfaction

Doctoral supervision: sharpening the focus of the practice lens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About