2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New perspectives on dimensionality and variability from large-scale cortical dynamics

Abstract: The neocortex is a multi-scale network, with intricate local circuitry interwoven into a global mesh of long-range connections. Neural activity propagates within this network on a wide range of temporal and spatial scales. At the micro scale, neurophysiological recordings reveal coordinated dynamics in local neural populations, which support behaviorally relevant computations. At the macro scale, neuroimaging modalities measure global activity fluctuations organized into spatiotemporal patterns across the enti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(120 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cortical networks encode information in a multidimensional coordinate system such that, contingent upon the route of activation, that is, behavior, activation weights in one dimension have more gain relative to another dimension but remain coregistered through homomorphism with one another. 6 Through neural gain modulation, representations that are more relevant (i.e., have higher likelihoods) in a given context can dominate and guide behavior, giving the system the flexibility needed to dynamically amplify aspects of representations in relation to the sensory context and behavioral goal (see Engel & Steinmetz, 2019, for a review). In such a coding scheme for language, knowledge of the lexicon, and grammatical, semantic, and contextual knowledge can be "shared" across modalities and recruited during the assembly of representations for articulation, as well as during the perceptual inference and generation of structures during comprehension.…”
Section: Concrete Examples Of Gain Modulation For Coordinate Transformentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical networks encode information in a multidimensional coordinate system such that, contingent upon the route of activation, that is, behavior, activation weights in one dimension have more gain relative to another dimension but remain coregistered through homomorphism with one another. 6 Through neural gain modulation, representations that are more relevant (i.e., have higher likelihoods) in a given context can dominate and guide behavior, giving the system the flexibility needed to dynamically amplify aspects of representations in relation to the sensory context and behavioral goal (see Engel & Steinmetz, 2019, for a review). In such a coding scheme for language, knowledge of the lexicon, and grammatical, semantic, and contextual knowledge can be "shared" across modalities and recruited during the assembly of representations for articulation, as well as during the perceptual inference and generation of structures during comprehension.…”
Section: Concrete Examples Of Gain Modulation For Coordinate Transformentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in electrophysiology and optical imaging techniques enable to study in awake behaving animals the persistence over time of neuronal coding properties, such as the tuning of neurons to specific stimuli (Rokni et al ., 2007; Tolias et al ., 2007; Bondar et al ., 2009; Andermann, Kerlin and Reid, 2010; Huber et al ., 2012; Ziv et al ., 2013; Peron et al ., 2015; Poort et al ., 2015; Okun et al ., 2016; Dhawale et al ., 2017; Jun et al ., 2017). Some of these studies exposed a substantial degree of variability in neuronal responses to the same stimuli over timescales spanning minutes to weeks, prompting neuroscientists to question the naïve assumption that stable neuronal codes are essential for stable brain functionality (Tolhurst, Movshon and Dean, 1983; Arieli et al ., 1996; Rokni et al ., 2007; Faisal, Selen and Wolpert, 2008; Minerbi et al ., 2009; Cohen and Maunsell, 2010; Huber et al ., 2012; Ziv et al ., 2013; Lütcke, Margolis and Helmchen, 2013; Montijn, Goltstein and Pennartz, 2015; Rubin et al ., 2015; Schölvinck et al ., 2015; Rose et al ., 2016; Chambers and Rumpel, 2017; Clopath et al ., 2017; Dhawale et al ., 2017; Driscoll et al ., 2017; Engel and Steinmetz, 2019; Rule et al ., 2020; Sheintuch et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second regime is where the firing rates are no longer dynamically stable, and large rate fluctuations are produced through internal interactions (as we will formalize below). In past work 47 we showed how model networks in this second regime produced the low-dimensional, population-wide shared variability characteristic of a variety of cortical areas 911,47,6669 . In this section we consider how networks in this second regime transfer information across layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A prominent feature of cortical response to sensory stimuli is that neuronal activity varies significantly across presentation trials 1,2 , even when efforts are taken to control or account for variable animal behavior 36 . A component of this variability is coordinated among neurons in a brain area, often leading to shared fluctuations in spiking activity 711 . How stimulus processing is affected by this large, population-wide neuronal variability is a longstanding question in both experimental and theoretical neuroscience communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%