2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New perspectives on natural products in TB drug research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
159
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
159
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Term 11 is the counterpart to X i +ΔX i in VelMod approach, and is proportional to the amount of stationary phase pumped into the column during sweep elution, Stage II; hence (12) This is solved as (13) Thus, at the point when the first droplet of stationary phase is ready to leave the column ( Figure 2D), solute i has traveled a volume represented by term 14 (14) This can be simplified to (15) Considering eq 1, term 15 is the same as …”
Section: The Volume Model (Volmod) Of Solute Retention In the Elutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Term 11 is the counterpart to X i +ΔX i in VelMod approach, and is proportional to the amount of stationary phase pumped into the column during sweep elution, Stage II; hence (12) This is solved as (13) Thus, at the point when the first droplet of stationary phase is ready to leave the column ( Figure 2D), solute i has traveled a volume represented by term 14 (14) This can be simplified to (15) Considering eq 1, term 15 is the same as …”
Section: The Volume Model (Volmod) Of Solute Retention In the Elutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As i keeps traveling by ΔV i during the sweep stage until there is no more mobile phase behind it, the amount of stationary phase that needs to be pumped is V M ×V CM ×V Ri −1 + ΔV i . At the point where no more mobile phase is behind it (Figure 2C), solute i has traveled a column volume represented by term 11Term 11 is the counterpart to X i +ΔX i in VelMod approach, and is proportional to the amount of stationary phase pumped into the column during sweep elution, Stage II; hence (12) This is solved as (13) Thus, at the point when the first droplet of stationary phase is ready to leave the column ( Figure 2D), solute i has traveled a volume represented by term 14 (14) This can be simplified to (15) Considering eq 1, term 15 is the same as …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of subjecting the false positive extracts to further testing is that the probability of missing possible active fractions or compounds would be greatly reduced since all fractions were tested (Pauli et al, 2005).…”
Section: Biological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este método foi realizado para definir a interação entre os extratos e frações de I. lutea que apresentaram atividade antibacteriana nas concentrações utilizadas (≤ 200 µg/mL) e determinar a Concentração Inibitória Fracional destes (CIF) frente S. aureus. 21 Foram utilizadas placas de microtitulação de 96 poços, meio de cultivo Muller Hinton (Himedia ® ) e condições de incubação ao final da preparação do experimento de 24h a uma temperatura de 36ºC ± 1. As placas foram preparadas adicionando um dos compostos diluídos em série no eixo X e o outro composto, previamente diluído, …”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…[26][27][28] Ao analisar a combinação das frações que apresentaram atividade antibacteriana (AcEO e MeOH) e a combinação dos extratos brutos etanólico e clorofórmico, podemos notar uma ação antibacteriana potencializada,-quando as frações são combinadas, podendo este fato estar ligado a uma possível interação ou aumento na taxa de constituintes fitoquímicos análogos com atividade antibacteriana. 21 Este fato demonstra que a combinação de produtos moderadamente ativos (como o caso da fração MeOH) decorre da possível ocorrência de substâncias ativos, as quais aumentam o potencial antibacteriano.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified