2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2022.119586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New perspectives on traps and radiative recombination centers for optically stimulated luminescence in LiF:Mg,Cu,P

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Above-room-temperature TL was performed using a home-built setup previously validated and reported in [22]. The heating rate was 0.5 K/s.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Above-room-temperature TL was performed using a home-built setup previously validated and reported in [22]. The heating rate was 0.5 K/s.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an application point of view, LiF is already a popular material due to its large ∼14 eV band gap [13] and its associated transparency in the deep UV region, excellent tissue equivalency, nontoxicity, low hygroscopicity, and versatility in terms of dopants. Despite its commercial use as a dosimeter [14] and the great extent of bibliography reporting on ionizing-radiation-induced production of defects [15][16][17] and color centers [18,19], the role of the commonly used Mg, Ti, Cu, and P dopants and the nature of the dosimetric traps responsible for TL and OSL remains yet to be clearly unraveled [20][21][22]. In particular, the role of the intrinsic STE luminescence as the radiative recombination center in LiF dosimeters remains unclear (see [23,24] for recent reviews).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%