1995
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3908(95)00063-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New phenylglycine derivatives with potent and selective antagonist activity at presynaptic glutamate receptors in neonatal rat spinal cord

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, group I antagonists UPF523 (Pellicciari et al, 1995;Sacaan et al, 1996) and MCPG attenuate rotation induced by 1S,3R-ACPD or DHPG. The Group II / III antagonists MTPG and MPPG (Jane et al, 1995;Beddingfield et al, 1996) have no effect, even at higher doses, although they are more potent at their respective receptors than UPF523 and MCPG are at group I receptors (Jane et al, 1995;Pellicciari et al, 1995;Beddingfield et al, 1996). Additionally, chronic lithium treatment, which impairs mGluRmediated PI signaling, suppresses 1S,3R-ACPD-induced rotational behavior (K. Kaatz and R. Albin, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussion Pharmacologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, group I antagonists UPF523 (Pellicciari et al, 1995;Sacaan et al, 1996) and MCPG attenuate rotation induced by 1S,3R-ACPD or DHPG. The Group II / III antagonists MTPG and MPPG (Jane et al, 1995;Beddingfield et al, 1996) have no effect, even at higher doses, although they are more potent at their respective receptors than UPF523 and MCPG are at group I receptors (Jane et al, 1995;Pellicciari et al, 1995;Beddingfield et al, 1996). Additionally, chronic lithium treatment, which impairs mGluRmediated PI signaling, suppresses 1S,3R-ACPD-induced rotational behavior (K. Kaatz and R. Albin, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussion Pharmacologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, CPPG (300 M), known as a group III mGluR antagonist (Jane et al, 1996;von Gersdorff et al, 1997;Awatramani and Slaughter, 2001;Nawy, 2004), could not suppress the inhibitory effect of L-AP-4 (20 -200 M) on the cone I Ca (n ϭ 4). MPPG (300 M), another group III mGluR antagonist (Jane et al, 1995;Koulen et al, 1999), was also ineffective in antagonizing L-AP-4-induced outward current in ON bipolar cells of the newt retina (data not shown). Group III mGluRs in newt retinas seem to have different pharmacological characteristics.…”
Section: L-ap-4 Inhibited L-type I Ca In Conesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In some of these cases, however, the activity of a compound at each of the cloned group III receptors has not been directly compared using the same assay system. In fact, for the compound MSPG, there is no information available for the activity of this ligand at any of the cloned group III mGluRs, and the ability of the compound to act as a group III mGluR antagonist has been inferred from its ability to block L-AP4 responses in various neuronal preparations (Jane et al, 1995;Bedingfield et al, 1996). Generation of the cell lines described above allowed us to rapidly assess the antagonist activity of a number of commercially available ligands described as group III mGluR antagonists.…”
Section: Mglur-mediated Thallium Flux Through Girk Channels 1215mentioning
confidence: 99%