2004
DOI: 10.1021/ic0351904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Poly-Iron(II) Complexes of N4O Dinucleating Schiff Bases and Pseudohalides:  Syntheses, Structures, and Magnetic and Mössbauer Properties

Abstract: Six dinuclear ferrous complexes including [Fe2(acpypentO)(O2CMe)(NCS)2] (1), [Fe2(acpypentO)(O2CMe)(NCSe)2] (2), [Fe2(acpypentO)(NCO)3] (3), ([Fe2(acpybutO)(O2CMe)(NCS)2] (5), [Fe2(acpybutO)(O2CMe)(NCO)2] (6), and [Fe2(acpybutO)(O2CMe)(N3)2] (7), one tetranuclear (bis-dinuclear) ferrous compound, [Fe4(acpypentO)2(N3)6] (4), and one mononuclear ferrous compound, [Fe(acpybutOH)(NCS)2] (8), have been prepared, and their structures and magnetic and Mössbauer properties have been studied (acpybutOH = 1,4-bis[[2-pyr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the temperature range 10-78 K, there is no significant variation of the doublets: the two sites exhibit almost temperature-independent isomer shifts and quadrupole splittings. For temperatures below 10 K, the spectra exhibit line-broadening and a spectrum with magnetic features is observed at 4.2 K. These spectra look slightly different from those recorded previously [13] essentially because of a remarkable sensitivity related to a strong dependence of the relaxation times on temperature below 7 K. From DC magnetic susceptibility measurements, no evidence for long-range effects were observed, which suggests that the magnetically split spectrum at 4.2 K is due to slow paramagnetic relaxation. The Mössbauer spectra are in line with the magnetic susceptibility measurements, which indicate ferromagnetic coupling between the ferrous ions.…”
Section: Mössbauer Spectroscopycontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the temperature range 10-78 K, there is no significant variation of the doublets: the two sites exhibit almost temperature-independent isomer shifts and quadrupole splittings. For temperatures below 10 K, the spectra exhibit line-broadening and a spectrum with magnetic features is observed at 4.2 K. These spectra look slightly different from those recorded previously [13] essentially because of a remarkable sensitivity related to a strong dependence of the relaxation times on temperature below 7 K. From DC magnetic susceptibility measurements, no evidence for long-range effects were observed, which suggests that the magnetically split spectrum at 4.2 K is due to slow paramagnetic relaxation. The Mössbauer spectra are in line with the magnetic susceptibility measurements, which indicate ferromagnetic coupling between the ferrous ions.…”
Section: Mössbauer Spectroscopycontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…At 78 K, the two ferrous sites are characterized by δ 1 = 1.01 mm s -1 , ∆E Q1 = 2.27 mm s -1 and δ 2 = 1.01 mm s -1 , ∆E Q2 = 3.38 mm s -1 . [13] The temperature dependence of the isomer shifts above 78 K is attributed to the second-order Doppler effect whereas the dependence of the quadrupole splitting values is typical for high-spin ferrous ions.…”
Section: Mössbauer Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In view of the structural data, the magnetic susceptibility has been computed by exact calculation of the energy levels associated with the spin Hamiltonian H = -J CoGd (S Co1 ·S Gd1 + S Co2 ·S Gd2 ) -j CoGd (S Co1 ·S Gd2 + S Co2 ·S Gd1 ) through diagonalization of the full energy matrix. [13] The best fit yields the following data, J CoGd = -1.0 cm -1 , j CoGd = -0.10 cm -1 , g = 2.04, with an R factor equal to 1.0 ϫ 10…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The II -O(phenoxy) distances. [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] The Fe II -S bond lengths are longer than the few previously reported for thioether complexes of high-spin iron(ii) (2.20-2.29 Å). [55] This should be due to the rigidity of the macrocycle, which does not allow the sulfur atoms to come closer to the iron(ii) ions.…”
Section: Description Of the Crystal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%