2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New polypropylene blends toughened by polypropylene/poly(ethylene-co-propylene) in-reactor alloy: Compositional and morphological influence on mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. One can see that ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) had the best toughening effect at room temperature, possibly because EPR, of all of the three toughening agents investigated, has the most similar structure to, and thus the highest compatibility with, PPR [10]. However, at a lower temperature of À25 C, PEGC had the best toughening effect for PPR compared with POE and EPR, since LLDPE was grafted onto the backbone chains of iPP in the PEGC particles, which acted as a compatibilizer to repress the crystalline-phase separation of LLDPE from iPP; the glass transition temperature (T g ) of LLDPE was À39 C, much lower than that of PPR, À19 C. As a result, the low-temperature (at À25 C) impact of PPR changed from brittle fracture to ductile fracture on addition of PEGC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4. One can see that ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) had the best toughening effect at room temperature, possibly because EPR, of all of the three toughening agents investigated, has the most similar structure to, and thus the highest compatibility with, PPR [10]. However, at a lower temperature of À25 C, PEGC had the best toughening effect for PPR compared with POE and EPR, since LLDPE was grafted onto the backbone chains of iPP in the PEGC particles, which acted as a compatibilizer to repress the crystalline-phase separation of LLDPE from iPP; the glass transition temperature (T g ) of LLDPE was À39 C, much lower than that of PPR, À19 C. As a result, the low-temperature (at À25 C) impact of PPR changed from brittle fracture to ductile fracture on addition of PEGC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and is a measure of the rate of non-isothermal crystallization; a is the ratio of the apparent Avrami index, n, to the Ozawa index, m, during non-isothermal crystallization: a ¼ n m (10) According to the Mo method (Equation 8), lnf is plotted against lnt at each of the predetermined relative degrees of crystallinity (20, 40, 60 and 80%) for the PEGC modified PPRs, the results of which are given in Fig. 12.…”
Section: Non-isothermal Crystallization Kinetics Of Pegc-modified Pprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, PLLA exhibits good rigidity and thermoplastic process ability, and thus has been a competitive alternative to some traditional polymers in the fields of food packaging, textile, clothing, etc. Actually, the physical/mechanical properties and end‐use performance of semi‐crystalline polymer are strongly dependent on its crystallization behavior and crystalline structure . Since the crystallization rate of PLLA is so slow, it even remains amorphous after processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are other techniques that can accomplish thermal fractionation, e.g. successive self‐nucleation and annealing (SSA), this method is very sensitive to the initial self‐seeding temperature as well as the annealing steps selected …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%