2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Possibilities for Magnetic Control of Chemical and Biochemical Reactions

Abstract: Chemistry is controlled by Coulomb energy; magnetic energy is lower by many orders of magnitude and may be confidently ignored in the energy balance of chemical reactions. The situation becomes less clear, however, when reaction rates are considered. In this case, magnetic perturbations of nearly degenerate energy surface crossings may produce observable, and sometimes even dramatic, effects on reactions rates, product yields, and spectroscopic transitions. A case in point that has been studied for nearly five… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…So occurring simultaneously with the sharp MIE-induced enzyme suppression, this fact itself makes it possible to consider these short, size-invalid, DNA segments not-fitting their crucial role in the DNA repair based protection of cancer cell. This confirms a concept (4,5,11,12) taking DNApolβ as a legitimate target for anti-tumor agents since its inhibition deprives the tumor cell of a DNA base-excision repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So occurring simultaneously with the sharp MIE-induced enzyme suppression, this fact itself makes it possible to consider these short, size-invalid, DNA segments not-fitting their crucial role in the DNA repair based protection of cancer cell. This confirms a concept (4,5,11,12) taking DNApolβ as a legitimate target for anti-tumor agents since its inhibition deprives the tumor cell of a DNA base-excision repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Recognizing the MIE phenomenon as a powerful modulator for matalloenzyme programmed phosphate transferring catalysis in vivo (10) and in vitro (11), it is hardly possible to underestimate its cytostatic potential as long as a MIE-DNApolβ match leads to a breakdown of the DNA repair related survival of neoplasma. Since physical and biophysical ion-radical mechanism of MIE is no longer enigmatic (2, 10, 11), we may disclose a fresh insight into not only the processes of replication and reparation of DNA but into some linked areas of molecular pharmacology as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some prophetic predictions regarding a therapeutic validity of epigenic DNA expression control in retinoblastoma (RB) has been publicized lately [8] and then confirmed considering the cancer DNA repair machinery as a target once its key part, DNA Polymerase Beta, overexpressed [2,7]. However, being predominantly based on experiments with RB cell lines like WERI-RB or Y79, this statement still may be treated as "immature" since the in vivo operating neuro-immune and neuro-endocrine paths are no doubt capable of making an impact on intracellular epigenetic environment.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This itself is about to deprive the cell of its usual DNA repair capabilities [1,2,8] which is a reason to expect the tumor growth to get limited [3,9]. Thus, the MIE-dependent formation of these "size The applied medicinal significance of these data looks promising due to the followings: (a) the MIE ion-radical mode [4][5][6][7] does not allow the most members of DNA Polymerases diversity (α, γ, δ) to get operated this way since the electron transfer distances in their catalytic sites are too long to make a "magnet" manifesting its MIE [1,3,5]; while (b) DNApolB is a perfect target for MIE-ions considering this enzyme active site 3D-structure [4,7]. Besides, (c) the above specified "magnets" were proven of being the substantial subjects for a cancer targeted delivery conducted with the low-toxic amphiphilic nanocationites [5,11].…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation