2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New potential drug leads against MDR-MTB: A short review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Novartis), , in the past two decades, the development of new drugs for TB has recaptured substantial global interest, resulting in the identification of many new lead candidates. Many reviews have been published addressing novel compounds with potent in vitro activity in the early stages of development (discovery), , and others have described the drug candidates in clinical studies. ,, Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of reviews covering the anti-TB compounds that have progressed to “validated lead” or preclinical development status, and, to the best of our knowledge, no article to date has specifically covered those compounds from a drug candidate profiling perspective. This section reviews the anti-TB compounds published in the last 6 years that have reached such stages (arising from hit-to-lead, lead optimization, and other preclinical investigations), focusing solely on those with proven efficacy against Mtb in animal models.…”
Section: Preclinical Promisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Novartis), , in the past two decades, the development of new drugs for TB has recaptured substantial global interest, resulting in the identification of many new lead candidates. Many reviews have been published addressing novel compounds with potent in vitro activity in the early stages of development (discovery), , and others have described the drug candidates in clinical studies. ,, Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of reviews covering the anti-TB compounds that have progressed to “validated lead” or preclinical development status, and, to the best of our knowledge, no article to date has specifically covered those compounds from a drug candidate profiling perspective. This section reviews the anti-TB compounds published in the last 6 years that have reached such stages (arising from hit-to-lead, lead optimization, and other preclinical investigations), focusing solely on those with proven efficacy against Mtb in animal models.…”
Section: Preclinical Promisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It bound to PBP2a at the allosteric site as seen by crystallographic analysis . Related quinazolinone structures are active against both MSSA and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (such as 14 ), and scaffold-hopping (from a nitroquinazolinone) gave thieno­[3,2- d ]­pyrimidin-4­(3 H )-one structures (exemplified by 15 ) that were active against Clostridioides difficile . Phenyl substitution at N-3 in this structure was disadvantageous.…”
Section: Resistance Mechanisms Of S Aureus Against the β-Lactamsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They exhibit in vivo activity in two mouse models of MRSA infection. ,, In these cases, inhibition of PBP activity was documented by fluorescence assays, by antagonizing chemical–genetic interactions by antisense methodology and by X-ray crystallography in two cases (discussed below). The antibacterial oxadiazoles and quinazolinones have been studied recently by other laboratories. …”
Section: The Discovery Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%