Improving Accessible Digital Practices in Higher Education 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Practices: Promoting the Role of ICT in the Shared Space of Transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it would be interesting to study what government-mandated infrastructure for students with autism is available (e.g. existence of collaboration between the universities, workplace and possible independent third-party organisations) (see also Bühler et al 2020). Furthermore, it would be also interesting to study the students' possible demands of self-direction in job search and issues related to autism and executive functions.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it would be interesting to study what government-mandated infrastructure for students with autism is available (e.g. existence of collaboration between the universities, workplace and possible independent third-party organisations) (see also Bühler et al 2020). Furthermore, it would be also interesting to study the students' possible demands of self-direction in job search and issues related to autism and executive functions.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But "new educational ICT services are seldom fully accessible" (Bühler et al, 2020, p. 129). Nevertheless, accessibility of digital learning environments is only the first step since learning materials and didactics must also be appropriately accessible and sensitive towards diverse learning conditions (Bühler et al, 2020;Emmerdinger et al, 2018).…”
Section: Digitalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernandez (2019, p. 2) points out that, especially in tertiary education, "ableist dynamics and 'disabling' ideologies" still shape the spaces in which teaching and learning take place. Often, the technologies used are not holistically designed with accessibility in mind (Burgstahler, 2015a), and improvements are always costly and time-consuming (Bühler et al, 2020). Even though it is emphasised in various instances that accessibility is advantageous for all students, hardly any studies can be found which explicitly address accessibility when examining the use of digital media (Grosch, 2012;Schmid et al, 2017;Steffens et al, 2017).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das Konzept zielt nicht darauf ab, eine standardisierte Lösung für alle zu finden. Vielmehr sollen inklusive Lernumgebungen und eine diversitätssensible Lernatmosphäre geschaffen werden, die Barrieren reduziert und individuelle Lernstrategien unterstützt (Burgstahler et al 2020). Dabei stehen in der Hochschuldidaktik die Optimierung der Lernprozesse und die flexible Gestaltung des Lerngegenstands im Vordergrund, um diese so für möglichst viele Studierende zugänglich zu machen (Bartz et al 2018).…”
Section: Universal Designunclassified
“…Unter den Bedingungen des ERT stand zu befürchten, dass in der kurzfristigen und umfassenden Umstellung auf digitale Lehre die Belange der ohnehin schon benachteiligten Gruppe der Studierenden mit Behinderungen auf der Strecke bleiben. Denn viele in der Hochschullehre eingesetzte Plattformen und Tools sind selten wirklich barrierefrei (Bühler et al 2020) und selbst barrierefreie Plattformen und Tools reichen nicht aus, wenn die eingestellten Inhalte es nicht sind, da diese die Barrierefreiheit der gesamten Lernumgebung massgeblich beeinflussen (Emmerdinger, Gegenfurtner, und Stern 2018). Dabei wird der Digitalisierung der Hochschulbildung ein grosses Potential für mehr Chancengerechtigkeit und Inklusion zugesprochen (Zorn 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified