2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New prediction models for dental age estimation in Thai children and adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have reported acceleration of the EDA in females compared to that in males. 10,32,39 However, the EDA among males could be in advance of that in females, as reported by Duangto et al, 40 who examined a Thai population and found mean differences of 0.11 and 0.10 years for males and females, respectively. In addition, Gungor et al 15 evaluated the applicability of Demirjian’s method for an elderly southern Turkish population and reported that the mean differences between the chronological and DAs ranged from 0.04 to 0.85 years and from 0.02 to 0.79 years in males and females, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Some researchers have reported acceleration of the EDA in females compared to that in males. 10,32,39 However, the EDA among males could be in advance of that in females, as reported by Duangto et al, 40 who examined a Thai population and found mean differences of 0.11 and 0.10 years for males and females, respectively. In addition, Gungor et al 15 evaluated the applicability of Demirjian’s method for an elderly southern Turkish population and reported that the mean differences between the chronological and DAs ranged from 0.04 to 0.85 years and from 0.02 to 0.79 years in males and females, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…No así la maduración dental, que dependerá de la magnitud de calcificación de los dientes, este proceso ocurre de manera constante sin alterarse por factores hormonales o nutricionales (Buschang et al). Se sabe que el método de Demirjian es un excelente indicador de edad cronológica se ha probado en poblaciones Iranís (Bagherian & Sadeghi, 2011), Saudíes (Al-Dharrab et al, 2017), Españoles (Delgado Tomás, 2014), Indues (Malik et al, 2012) y tailandeses (Duangto et al, 2016) encontrando que es una herramienta útil; sin embargo estas aseveraciones son inexactas ya que se calcularon mediante correlaciones, las cuales estadísticamente no son el método de elección para probar concordancia o validez (Cortés-Reyes et al, 2010), existen reportes de que la edad dental es variable por razas incluso se ha ajustado el método de Demirjian a otras poblaciones, sin embargo el procedimiento estadístico no es concreto (Willems et al, 2001). Los hallazgos en población mexicana son bastante concordantes (CCI masculinos 0,962, femeninos 0,923 y ambos sexos 0,944) por lo que se puede pensar que la herramienta es útil en esta población, sin embargo el rango de edad fue limitado por lo que una población más amplia seria de utilidad.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…2 Various skeletal parts have been conducted on Thai populations to estimate age, which includes: cranial suture, teeth, chest plate, clavicle, acetabulum, pubic symphysis, and vertebral column. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The potentiality, accuracy, correlation, and error rates for the estimated age of each skeletal part are inconsistent. Therefore, the development of aging methods from skeletons with high accuracy in the Thai population is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%