2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New prediction tool—LIST—with improved prediction accuracy for 30-day readmission rates in patients with head and neck cancer after major cancer surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the cutoff point of 22 days for length of stay was chosen, defined as LOS longer than 66% of the population. It was similar to our previous finding which was associated with a 30‐day readmission rate (Yin et al, 2020). Third, surgery complexity was highly associated with perioperative short‐term outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the cutoff point of 22 days for length of stay was chosen, defined as LOS longer than 66% of the population. It was similar to our previous finding which was associated with a 30‐day readmission rate (Yin et al, 2020). Third, surgery complexity was highly associated with perioperative short‐term outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Theoretically, adequate neck dissection defined by lymph node yield, and negative margins were associated with better outcomes (Anderson et al, 2015; Divi et al, 2016). Thirty‐day readmission after major head and neck cancer, and prolonged length of stay, another proxy of imperfect surgery and comorbidities, were associated with worse long‐term outcomes (Jacobs et al, 2021; Yin et al, 2020). Thereafter, overall TO could be regarded as a summation of preoperative evaluation, surgery, and postoperative care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The LIST tool, which uses leukocytosis, Charlson comorbidity, LOS, and advanced tumor stage to predict readmission, was derived in a population of patients with head and neck cancer and was shown in the derivation study to have higher prediction accuracy for readmission after major cancer surgery compared with the LACE and HOSPITAL risk scores. 20 Although three of the four LIST variables were similar to our derived score, comorbidity was not shown to be a predictor of readmission in our study. It is unclear as to why, and perhaps is more descriptive of the study population in a comprehensive cancer center that are often referred from other institutions because of progressive, complex, and advanced disease.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%