2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-020-02921-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New progress of ammonia recovery during ammonia nitrogen removal from various wastewaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in dynamic tests indicate that the cultures of nitrifying bacteria added to the system were successively removed with the treated sewage over time, which corresponds to the data found in the literature [11,23,50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained in dynamic tests indicate that the cultures of nitrifying bacteria added to the system were successively removed with the treated sewage over time, which corresponds to the data found in the literature [11,23,50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A higher rate of biomass increase is observed in municipal wastewater due to the maintenance of the required proportions between biogenic elements. In the case of industrial wastewater, in which biogenic elements are present in unfavourable proportions or carbon is in a form that is not available for organisms, the rate of biomass increase is lower [20][21][22][23][24]. During metabolic dissimilation, ammonium nitrogen is transformed in the processes of nitrification and then denitrification [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of technologies are currently available for TAN recovery, such as air scrubbers [6], reverse osmosis [7], adsorbent materials [8], evaporation techniques [9], struvite precipitation [10], nitrification-denitrification processes [11], the anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) process [12], microbial fuel cells [13], or treatment with microalgae and photosynthetic bacteria [14,15]. However, they have important limitations that hinder their widespread application: air scrubbers and zeolite adsorption techniques require manure pre-treatment [16], reverse osmosis requires high working pressures, struvite precipitation requires additives [17], and biological treatments are only effective at low to medium TAN concentrations [18], given that bacterial activity can be inhibited in the presence of high organic matter and nitrogen contents [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology, based on the passage of NH 3 through a hydrophobic microporous membrane and its subsequent capture and concentration in an extraction solution on the other side of the membrane, offers advantages such as high transfer surface area, low working pressures, no need for manure clarification pre-treatment or additives [16], low energy consumption, and the possibility of being used in combination with other treatment technologies [20]. Its main drawback is the cost of installation and maintenance of the membranes [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an excess of N caused mainly by anthropogenic activities such as intensive agricultural practices, rapid industrialization, unplanned urbanization, and many others has severe deleterious effects on the environment. Effluents discharged from the industrial and municipal processes and livestock facilities without proper treatment are affecting the waterbodies worldwide through eutrophication, decreasing dissolved oxygen concentration, fish kills, declining aquatic biodiversity and diminishing recreational water usage [1,2]. A recent study reported that potential economic losses due to eutrophication of freshwater resources in the US is around USD 2.2 billion annually [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%