2018
DOI: 10.1134/s0013873818090026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Records of Megachilid Bees (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the North Caucasus and Neighboring Regions of Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taxonomic studies of this group in Egypt are very scarce (e.g., Alfken (9,10) , Krombein (17)). The present contribution adopts the classification system of Litman et al (3), Faterygaa et al (12), and Zakikhani et al (13) to the Egyptian members of Anthidiini, within five genera. Other studies treated all five genera as a single one (i.e., Anthidium) (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taxonomic studies of this group in Egypt are very scarce (e.g., Alfken (9,10) , Krombein (17)). The present contribution adopts the classification system of Litman et al (3), Faterygaa et al (12), and Zakikhani et al (13) to the Egyptian members of Anthidiini, within five genera. Other studies treated all five genera as a single one (i.e., Anthidium) (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Egypt, the taxonomic studies on the members of the tribe Anthidiini were first conducted by Alfken (9,10) and the recent revision to the family Megachilidae were carried out by Salem and El-Azab (11) who presented eighteen Egyptian species of tribe Anthidiini within a single genus (Anthidium Fabricius, 1804). Before and after Salem and El-Azab's classification (11) many authors distributed these species among five genera (Pachyanthidium, Icteranthidium, Pseudoanthidium, Afranthidium, and Anthidium) (e.g., Litman et al (3), Faterygaa (12) and Zakikhani et al (13), accordingly, the present revision adopts this classification to the Egyptian Anthidiini.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A list of just 30 species, including one species later synonymized, was published 150 years ago (Morawitz 1873); six of them were described as new, of which four are currently recognized as valid species. Some recently published papers (Fateryga 2017;Fateryga et al 2019;Fateryga and Proshchalykin 2020;Litman et al 2021) added 46 species increasing the total species number to 75, which is expected to be still very far from the true number of megachilid bee species occurring in Dagestan. The present contribution is a part of the currently ongoing study of the megachilid bees of Dagestan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on the distribution of species in this paper are based upon Proshchalykin & Fateryga (2017) and Ascher & Pickering (2021), taking into account some additional data from Popov (1967), Byvaltsev et al (2018), Maharramov et al (2014), Fateryga et al (2019, , Levchenko (2020), Varnava et al (2020), andZakikhani et al (2021). Previous records of each species from Nakhchivan AR in the literature are indicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%