2021
DOI: 10.22201/ib.20078706e.2021.92.3538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New records of the genus Lobophora (Dictyotales: Phaeophyceae) for the marine flora of Cuba and their distribution in the Greater Caribbean Sea

Abstract: Taxonomy and systematics New records of the genus Lobophora (Dictyotales: Phaeophyceae) for the marine flora of Cuba and their distribution in the Greater Caribbean Sea Nuevos registros del género Lobophora (Dictyotales: Phaeophyceae) para la flora marina de Cuba y su distribución en el Gran Caribe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, we have found specimens with up to 10 layers, 2 more than previously reported. In L. variegata, the specimens examined are similar to previous reports from Mexico (Godínez-Ortega et al, 2018), Cuba (Torres-Conde et al, 2021), and other Caribbean localities (Camacho et al, 2019;Vieira et al, 2016;Vieira, Henriques et al, 2020;Vieira, Morrow et al, 2020), but the overall measurement ranges were smaller. This could be attributed to where sections were made or the developmental stage of the samples, which can make identification difficult based only on thallus thickness (Vieira et al, 2014).…”
Section: Lobophora Dispersasupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remarkably, we have found specimens with up to 10 layers, 2 more than previously reported. In L. variegata, the specimens examined are similar to previous reports from Mexico (Godínez-Ortega et al, 2018), Cuba (Torres-Conde et al, 2021), and other Caribbean localities (Camacho et al, 2019;Vieira et al, 2016;Vieira, Henriques et al, 2020;Vieira, Morrow et al, 2020), but the overall measurement ranges were smaller. This could be attributed to where sections were made or the developmental stage of the samples, which can make identification difficult based only on thallus thickness (Vieira et al, 2014).…”
Section: Lobophora Dispersasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Measurements of the medullar, subcortical, and cortical cells were made following the anatomical description used by Schultz et al (2015), using a Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope. Maximum and minimum values were obtained for each trait and compared with previous descriptions (Camacho et al, 2019;Godínez-Ortega et al, 2018;Torres-Conde et al, 2021;Vieira, Henriques et al, 2020;Vieira, Morrow et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%