2011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1280425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Reference Curves on Maternal Weight Gain in Twin Pregnancy

Abstract: Purpose: Aim of the study was to generate reliable weight reference curves on maternal weight gain in twin pregnancy and to compare them to previous studies. Methods: A retrospective mixed model analysis was done at the Obstetric Outpatient Clinic of Zurich University Hospital to evaluate data gathered from 1/2004 to 4/2008. Maternal weight and BMI, before gestation and at the booking visit, as well as the infant birth weight were determined in 245 accurately dateable twin pregnancies of Caucasian women. 5th, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twelve articles reported on GWG and fetal growth, and they consistently demonstrated that after accounting for differences in gestational duration, mothers with twin pregnancies who gained less weight were more likely than those with higher weight gain to deliver infants that were lighter at birth and were more likely to be SGA (20, 24, 27, 28, 36) (Tables 2 and 3). Similar findings were observed in the studies that stratified by prepregnancy BMI (21, 22, 2628, 30), but results were not always statistically significant due to reduced sample sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Twelve articles reported on GWG and fetal growth, and they consistently demonstrated that after accounting for differences in gestational duration, mothers with twin pregnancies who gained less weight were more likely than those with higher weight gain to deliver infants that were lighter at birth and were more likely to be SGA (20, 24, 27, 28, 36) (Tables 2 and 3). Similar findings were observed in the studies that stratified by prepregnancy BMI (21, 22, 2628, 30), but results were not always statistically significant due to reduced sample sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Control for gestational age was performed in 18 of the 25 studies (19–22, 2430, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 42, 45), for prepregnancy BMI in 17 studies (2024, 2628, 30, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 42, 44, 45) (all of which defined BMI based on recalled prepregnancy weight), chorionicity and/or assisted reproductive technologies in 3 studies (27, 32, 33), and other covariates in 11 studies (20, 22, 24, 27, 32, 3638, 41, 42, 44). Nine presented results stratified by prepregnancy BMI categories (21, 22, 2628, 30, 35, 39) (including one which presented results only for normal weight women (27)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations