2008
DOI: 10.1051/ro:2008010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New representation to reduce the search space for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem

Abstract: Abstract. This paper describes a new representation for the solutions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem (RCPSP) denoted Activity Set List. The most efficient heuristics for the problem use the activity list representation and the serial SGS method to construct the corresponding solution (schedule). The activity list may induce a search space of representations much larger then the space of schedules because the same schedule can correspond to many different activity list representations. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Klein & Scholl (1999) presented two meta-strategies for computing lower bounds for this challenging problem, and mentioned that the lack of strong lower bounds prevented the exact algorithms to solve large-sized problem instances. Moumene & Ferland (2008) mentioned that most exact algorithms from the literature are used to solve small problems with less than 60 activities, while heuristic procedures are alternatives to deal with larger problems. Inspired by these two research studies, Coelho & Vanhoucke (2018) recently implemented various lower bounds into different well-performing B&B procedures from the literature to solve the RCPSP, hoping that they could solve much bigger instances.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klein & Scholl (1999) presented two meta-strategies for computing lower bounds for this challenging problem, and mentioned that the lack of strong lower bounds prevented the exact algorithms to solve large-sized problem instances. Moumene & Ferland (2008) mentioned that most exact algorithms from the literature are used to solve small problems with less than 60 activities, while heuristic procedures are alternatives to deal with larger problems. Inspired by these two research studies, Coelho & Vanhoucke (2018) recently implemented various lower bounds into different well-performing B&B procedures from the literature to solve the RCPSP, hoping that they could solve much bigger instances.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Thomas and Salhi [ 26 ], the RCPSP is a NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem. The exact algorithms such as linear programming and branch-and-bound technique are feasible to solve this problem, but only effective for those small-sized problems with less than 60 activities [ 27 ]. For large-sized instances, it is proved that heuristic algorithms and more optimal solutions have better performance [ 28 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Moumene and Ferland (2008) proposed to decode solutions by using Activity Set List (ASL), which represents an ordered subset list of different non-empty activities. Each subset consists of a group of activities which share common characteristics, such as predecessors and successors; therefore, by using an ASL, the search space is significantly reduced.…”
Section: Solution Representation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%