2012
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.2787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New results on static output feedback H ∞  control for fuzzy singularly perturbed systems: a linear matrix inequality approach

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents the novel approaches of designing robust fuzzy static output feedback H ∞  controller for a class of nonlinear singularly perturbed systems. Specifically, the considered system is approximated by a fuzzy singularly perturbed model. With the use of linear matrix inequality (LMI) methods, two methods are provided to design fuzzy static output feedback H ∞  controllers. The resulted controllers can guarantee that the closed‐loop systems are asymptotically stable and satisfy H ∞  perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One advantage of the conditions is that they contain real variables only, which avoid the computation complexity of involving complex variables, such as in [41]. The other one is that output matrices C i is unrestricted while some existing results assume matrix C i with full row rank or C 1 = C 2 = = C i = C [44]. Corollary 2 System (10) with fractional order 1 < α < 2 is stable if and only if there exist matrices P ¯ = P ¯ T , thinmathspaceQ ¯ = Q ¯ T , thinmathspaceA ~ i , thinmathspaceB ~ i , thinmathspaceC ~ i , thinmathspacei = 1 , thinmathspace2 , thinmathspace , thinmathspacer , such that the following LMIs hold: right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptcenter center1em4ptQ ¯ I P ¯ > 0 , right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptnormalΞ false¯ 11 i i < 0 , right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptcenter center center1em4pt…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of the conditions is that they contain real variables only, which avoid the computation complexity of involving complex variables, such as in [41]. The other one is that output matrices C i is unrestricted while some existing results assume matrix C i with full row rank or C 1 = C 2 = = C i = C [44]. Corollary 2 System (10) with fractional order 1 < α < 2 is stable if and only if there exist matrices P ¯ = P ¯ T , thinmathspaceQ ¯ = Q ¯ T , thinmathspaceA ~ i , thinmathspaceB ~ i , thinmathspaceC ~ i , thinmathspacei = 1 , thinmathspace2 , thinmathspace , thinmathspacer , such that the following LMIs hold: right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptcenter center1em4ptQ ¯ I P ¯ > 0 , right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptnormalΞ false¯ 11 i i < 0 , right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptcenter center center1em4pt…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During system analysis and design, the interaction between fast and slow modes brings about ill‐conditioned numerical (ICN) and high‐dimensionality issues. Such multi–time‐scale models are described as singularly perturbed systems (SPSs), which contain a singular perturbation parameter (SPP) ε . One of the main problems for SPSs is to find the ε ‐bound ε 0 , such that the performance of SPSs is guaranteed for ∀ ε ∈ (0, ε 0 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such multi-time-scale models are described as singularly perturbed systems (SPSs), which contain a singular perturbation parameter (SPP) . [1][2][3][4] One of the main problems for SPSs is to find the -bound 0 , such that the performance of SPSs is guaranteed for ∀ ∈ (0, 0 ]. 3,4 The issues of controller design and estimating the -bound for SPSs have been considered, which are illustrated by electronic circuits systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some progresses based on fuzzy singularly perturbed model have been achieved for nonlinear SPSs [11]- [22]. Stability analysis and H ∞ control based on homotopy iterative LMI algorithm [11,12], fuzzy H ∞ filter [13] and dynamic output feedback controller [14] with the pole placement constraints and H ∞ filter [15]and H ∞ controllers [16] with consideration of the bound of singular perturbation parameter ε and static output feedback H ∞ control [17] for continuous-time fuzzy SPSs were developed. The above results are ε-independent and can be applied to both standard and nonstandard nonlinear SPSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%