2021
DOI: 10.1090/tran/8338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New results on the prefix membership problem for one-relator groups

Abstract: In this paper we prove several results regarding decidability of the membership problem for certain submonoids in amalgamated free products and HNN extensions of groups. These general results are then applied to solve the prefix membership problem for a number of classes of one-relator groups which are low in the Magnus-Moldavanskiȋ hierarchy. Since the prefix membership problem for one-relator groups is intimately related to the word problem for one-relator special inverse monoids in the E-unitary case (as di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many equivalent definitions, but for our purposes, it is the best to express it in the following way: 𝑇 = Inv 𝐴 | 𝑤 𝑖 = 1 (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼) is E-unitary if in the natural homomorphism from T to its greatest group image 𝐺 = Gp 𝐴 | 𝑤 𝑖 = 1 (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼) , the only pre-images of the identity element of G are the idempotents of T. Now, yet another major result of [15] shows that when 𝑇 = Inv 𝐴 | 𝑤 𝑖 = 1 (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼) is E-unitary then, provided Gp 𝐴 | 𝑤 𝑖 = 1 (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼) has decidable word problem, the decidability of the word problem of T reduces to the membership problem for the prefix monoid of G. In the same paper, they also prove that when w is a cyclically reduced word, then Inv 𝐴 | 𝑤 = 1 is E-unitary, and thus the word problem reduces to the prefix membership problem for the corresponding one-relator group in this case. The prefix membership problem for one-relator groups has been studied by several authors (e.g., in [16,25]) and more recently by the present authors in [7]. The close connections between prefix monoids of groups and right units of special inverse monoids described above mean that it is natural to investigate both classes in parallel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are many equivalent definitions, but for our purposes, it is the best to express it in the following way: 𝑇 = Inv 𝐴 | 𝑤 𝑖 = 1 (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼) is E-unitary if in the natural homomorphism from T to its greatest group image 𝐺 = Gp 𝐴 | 𝑤 𝑖 = 1 (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼) , the only pre-images of the identity element of G are the idempotents of T. Now, yet another major result of [15] shows that when 𝑇 = Inv 𝐴 | 𝑤 𝑖 = 1 (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼) is E-unitary then, provided Gp 𝐴 | 𝑤 𝑖 = 1 (𝑖 ∈ 𝐼) has decidable word problem, the decidability of the word problem of T reduces to the membership problem for the prefix monoid of G. In the same paper, they also prove that when w is a cyclically reduced word, then Inv 𝐴 | 𝑤 = 1 is E-unitary, and thus the word problem reduces to the prefix membership problem for the corresponding one-relator group in this case. The prefix membership problem for one-relator groups has been studied by several authors (e.g., in [16,25]) and more recently by the present authors in [7]. The close connections between prefix monoids of groups and right units of special inverse monoids described above mean that it is natural to investigate both classes in parallel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the same paper, they also prove that when w is a cyclically reduced word, then is E -unitary, and thus the word problem reduces to the prefix membership problem for the corresponding one-relator group in this case. The prefix membership problem for one-relator groups has been studied by several authors (e.g., in [16, 25]) and more recently by the present authors in [7]. The close connections between prefix monoids of groups and right units of special inverse monoids described above mean that it is natural to investigate both classes in parallel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned in the introduction, the prefix membership problem for one-relator groups has been shown to be decidable in a number of special cases. See also [8] for some more recent results showing that the prefix membership problem is decidable for certain classes of one-relator groups which are low down in the Magnus-Moldovanskii hierarchy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Λ = {ad, acd, abcd, abbcd}, whereas the Adian algorithm would incorrectly yield Λ = {abcdacdadabbcdacd}. We remark that the word problem for O was solved by Dolinka & Gray[15, Proposition 5.4].In view of the above example, if w is a word which is (1) positive; and (2) self-overlap free; and (3) the factorisation into minimal invertible factors of w in Inv A | w = 1 is non-trivial, then we say that Inv A | w = 1 is O'Haresque. In §4 we shall provide an infinite family of considerably simpler examples of O'Haresque monoids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%