“…For example, the turn-on field for the GaS nanohorns is 4.2 V/μm, for the aligned CdS nanowires, it is ∼7.8 V/μm, for the multipods, it is ∼7.2 V/μm, for the TiO 2 nanotip array, it is ∼9.4 V/μm, for the nanotube, it is ∼34 V/μm, for the ZnS nanobelts, it is ∼3.8 V/μm, for the ZnO nanowires, it is∼5 V/μm, for the nanonails, it is ∼7.9 V/μm, and for the nanopencils, it is 7.2 V/μm . The turn-on field ∼1.3 V/μm for the PPy/SnO 2 p–n junctions is also less than the electric field observed in different carbon nanostructures such as UNCD (5.6 V/μm), CNTs [(2.3 V/μm), (1.55 V/μm)], UNCD/CNTs (4.9 V/μm), CNT/ZnO films (1.3 and 2.5 V/μm), UNCD-decorated silicon nanowires (3.7 V/μm), GS (4.4 V/μm), GS/CsI (2.5 V/μm), MWCNTs/CsI (3.2 V/m), and various other nanostructures of carbon. − The turn-on field of the prepared p–n junction in PPy is also less than or equal to the MWCNT/PPy nanocomposite (1.4 V/μm) and PPy/tetrabutylammonium-hexafluorophosphate (PPy/TBAPF 6 ) nanowires (3.5 V/μm) . The electron density is strongly dependent upon the work function (Φ) and the field-enhancement factor (β), and the value of β can be obtained from the F–N plots of ln( J / E 2 ) versus 1/ E as shown in Figure d by considering that Φ is known.…”