2016
DOI: 10.5937/spsunp1601011m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Sharp lower bounds for the first Zagreb index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 3.18 In [16], the present authors proved that Ψ * 1 and Ψ * 2 are incomparable. In addition, the lower bounds (3.19), (3.13), (3.20), and (3.14) are also incomparable respectively (Table 3): Next, we improve inequality (2.5) for the forgotten index F (G) using the harmonic index H(G).…”
Section: Theorem 316mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Remark 3.18 In [16], the present authors proved that Ψ * 1 and Ψ * 2 are incomparable. In addition, the lower bounds (3.19), (3.13), (3.20), and (3.14) are also incomparable respectively (Table 3): Next, we improve inequality (2.5) for the forgotten index F (G) using the harmonic index H(G).…”
Section: Theorem 316mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…wherefrom (21) is obtained. Equality in (22), and hence in (21), is attained if and only if α = β or d…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inequality (23) was proven in [19], the inequality (24) in [20], (25) in [7], (26) in [22], (27) in [6], (28) in [11]. The inequality (23) was proven in [13] for the case α = 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the recent outcomes on Zagreb indices, see [8,17,3] and references therein. Li and Zheng [14] introduced the generalized version of the first Zagreb index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%