2011
DOI: 10.4137/cin.s7789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Short Term Prediction Method for Chemical Carcinogenicity by Hepatic Transcript Profiling following 28-Day Toxicity Tests in Rats

Abstract: We have previously shown the hepatic gene expression profiles of carcinogens in 28-day toxicity tests were clustered into three major groups (Group-1 to 3). Here, we developed a new prediction method for Group-1 carcinogens which consist mainly of genotoxic rat hepatocarcinogens. The prediction formula was generated by a support vector machine using 5 selected genes as the predictive genes and predictive score was introduced to judge carcinogenicity. It correctly predicted the carcinogenicity of all 17 Group-1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carcinogenic substances contained in each group were previously reported in a study examining the gene expression patterns of carcinogens (Matsumoto et al, 2009(Matsumoto et al, , 2011. Table 1 summarizes the toxicity test conditions, carcinogenic properties, and carcinogen group number (Group-1 to 3) as determined in a previous study of the test chemicals (Matsumoto et al, 2009(Matsumoto et al, , 2011. The carcinogens group was determined based on the similarity of gene expression patterns.…”
Section: Test Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The carcinogenic substances contained in each group were previously reported in a study examining the gene expression patterns of carcinogens (Matsumoto et al, 2009(Matsumoto et al, , 2011. Table 1 summarizes the toxicity test conditions, carcinogenic properties, and carcinogen group number (Group-1 to 3) as determined in a previous study of the test chemicals (Matsumoto et al, 2009(Matsumoto et al, , 2011. The carcinogens group was determined based on the similarity of gene expression patterns.…”
Section: Test Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies (Matsumoto et al, 2011), these genes were selected based on two criteria as follows: the first criterion was that the Welch t-value of the log 2 ratio between the training sets of carcinogens and non-carcinogens was more than 3, where the log 2 ratio is the logarithm to base 2 of the mean of the signal intensity ratio between the treated sample and the vehicle control. The Welch t-value is used for judging statistically whether the gene expression of carcinogens differs significantly, compared with non-carcinogens, as it is used in significance tests between two groups with possibly unequal variances.…”
Section: Predictive Gene Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After applying the log2 ratio data of 15 predictive genes to CARCINOscreen ® , the largest value among the predictive scores obtained using the three prediction formulae was determined as the final predictive score. The details of the microarray experiments for CARCINOscreen ® are described in Matsumoto et al (2009Matsumoto et al ( , 2011Matsumoto et al ( and 2014.…”
Section: Rna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system consists of three prediction formulae generated from 15 characteristically predictive genes. The accuracy of this microarray-based CARCINOscreen ® for carcinogenicity prediction is reported as 94.1% for training chemical sets, therefore, this prediction system may be a promising tool for predicting hepatocarcinogenicity of chemicals in rats (Matsumoto et al, 2009(Matsumoto et al, , 2011(Matsumoto et al, and 2014. However, microarray analysis requires specialized equipment and skilled bioinformatics approaches for data analysis, limiting its versatility for the toxicological applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%