2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1326-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New simple image overlay system using a tablet PC for pinpoint identification of the appropriate site for anastomosis in peripheral arterial reconstruction

Abstract: Our image overlay system was easy to use and allowed us to precisely identify a target artery preoperatively. Therefore, this system could be helpful for pinpointing the most accurate incision site during surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more accurate identification of the appropriate anastomotic site, we used an exploratory image overlay system with a tablet PC for 10 CLI patients. 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more accurate identification of the appropriate anastomotic site, we used an exploratory image overlay system with a tablet PC for 10 CLI patients. 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AR has also been successfully employed during splenectomies in children [ 33 ] and urological procedures [ 86 ]. With the increasing precision of AR systems, they can be safely used even in endocrine surgeries [ 87 – 89 ], otorhinolaryngologic surgery [ 90 ], eye surgery [ 91 ], vascular surgery [ 92 , 93 ], or dental implantology too [ 60 ]; however, their exact usefulness in such surgeries is not exactly quantified owing to the complicated structures [ 61 ]. An AR system for transcatheter aortic valve implantation was designed and successfully used by Currie et al, showing comparable accuracy to traditional fluoroscopic guidance technique, hence avoiding impending complications of contrast agent administration [ 93 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the clinical studies, 6% (2/32) were cohort studies [15,19], which were found to have a moderate risk of bias according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool for nonrandomized trials [13]. Of the 32 studies, 1 (3%) was a case-control study [25] with a score of 55% according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, 7 (22%) were case series studies [28,32,[37][38][39][40] with SD (16.1%) an average score of 70% (SD 16.1%; range 50%-80%), and 3 (9%) were case reports [16,36,39] an average score of 65% (range 40%-95%).…”
Section: Critical Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%