2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6404/abad4c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New solution method for the problem of a uniformly charged straight wire

Abstract: A common problem in electrostatics is determining the electrostatic potential due to a uniformly charged straight wire. The solution of this problem illustrates well the types of calculations that one must perform in order to obtain the electrostatic potential or field of a given continuous charge distribution. In this work, we reconsider and solve the problem of a uniformly charged straight wire via a new method that is different from the popular direct integration approach found in the majority of physics te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Worthy of note, the occurrence of infinite stacks of homochiral (twisted) molecules, where the offset of the Br atoms generates a weak dipole (0.35 D in 0 Br ) may further stabilize, through an infinite number of dipolar interactions, the twisted conformer. However, using Ciftja's model [24] and the stacking parameters shown in Figure 3, such stabilization falls near 0.1 kJ mol −1 , that is two orders of magnitude lower than π–π stacking, and is, in our discussion, a negligible term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Worthy of note, the occurrence of infinite stacks of homochiral (twisted) molecules, where the offset of the Br atoms generates a weak dipole (0.35 D in 0 Br ) may further stabilize, through an infinite number of dipolar interactions, the twisted conformer. However, using Ciftja's model [24] and the stacking parameters shown in Figure 3, such stabilization falls near 0.1 kJ mol −1 , that is two orders of magnitude lower than π–π stacking, and is, in our discussion, a negligible term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“… Uniformly charged rectangular plate. The exact calculation of Ufalse(Lx,Lyfalse)$U(L_x,L_y)$ is very challenging with the final result obtained by Ciftja [ 73 ] that reads: U(Lx,Ly)=keQ21Lx0.16emsinh1()LxLy+1Ly0.16emsinh1()LyLx+13[]LxLy2+LyLx21Lx2+1Ly2Lx2+Ly2$$\begin{eqnarray} U(L_x,L_y) &=& k_e \, Q^2 \left(\frac{1}{L_x} \, \sinh ^{-1} {\left(\frac{L_x}{L_y}\right)} +\frac{1}{L_y} \, \sinh ^{-1} {\left(\frac{L_y}{L_x} \right)}\right. \nonumber\\ &&+\left.\frac{1}{3}\left[\frac{L_x}{L_y^2} +\frac{L_y}{L_x^2} - \left(\frac{1}{L_x^2} +\frac{1}{L_y^2}\right)\sqrt{L_x^2+L_y^2}\right]\right) \end{eqnarray}$$ Uniformly charged equilateral triangle.…”
Section: Other Instances Related To Equilibrium Electrostatics Onlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent examples that feature in almost all calculus-based undergraduate physics textbooks that deal with the topics of electricity and magnetism [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] are objects like a uniformly charged finite line, ring, disk, spherical surface and solid sphere. The 1D case of a finite line with constant linear charge density is easy to handle by direct integration using a variety of methods [8]. The 3D case studies of a conducting spherical surface with constant surface charge density and a non-conducting solid sphere with constant volume charge density are perfect examples that illustrate the application of Gauss's law to derive the electric field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%