1990
DOI: 10.1021/es00077a017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New source identification of mercury contamination in the Great Lakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the observations of higher THg concentrations deeper within the core at the central locations, suggests that historical watershed loads were larger than contemporary inputs, which is a conclusion supported by dated sediment cores from the reservoir (Curtis et al, 2013). Overall, the sediment THg concentrations measured in our study were higher than concentrations typically observed in background sediments (mean range: 0.1-0.2 lg/g; Glass et al (1990), Krabbenhoft et al (1999)), and likely reflect the influence of historical mining activity in the watershed. At the three seasonally inundated sediment sample locations, the MeHg concentration were all clearly higher in the top 0-2 cm of the sediment compared to lower depths (Fig.…”
Section: Reservoir Sediment Thg and Mehgsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, the observations of higher THg concentrations deeper within the core at the central locations, suggests that historical watershed loads were larger than contemporary inputs, which is a conclusion supported by dated sediment cores from the reservoir (Curtis et al, 2013). Overall, the sediment THg concentrations measured in our study were higher than concentrations typically observed in background sediments (mean range: 0.1-0.2 lg/g; Glass et al (1990), Krabbenhoft et al (1999)), and likely reflect the influence of historical mining activity in the watershed. At the three seasonally inundated sediment sample locations, the MeHg concentration were all clearly higher in the top 0-2 cm of the sediment compared to lower depths (Fig.…”
Section: Reservoir Sediment Thg and Mehgsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Background concentrations in Lake Geneva sediments are B0.2 mg kg À 1 . Although the chemistry and transport behavior of Hg is complex, particulate transport is dominant in most systems (Glass et al, 1990;Wang et al, 2004). Assuming that particleassociated bacteria or bacterial aggregates released from the WWTP are in turn primarily responsible for ARG deposition in the sediment, we expected a similar pollution pattern for THg and ARGs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Args and Hg Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Elemental mercury is eventually removed from the atmosphere by oxidation to a water-soluble species and by dry deposition. Although large-scale releases of mercury have been controlled in the United States, atmospheric transport implicates smaller sources (combustion of coal, municipal solid waste and sewage sludge) as the cause of widespread elevations of mercury concentrations in remote ecosystems [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%