2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.684122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Sources of Eastern Filbert Blight Resistance and Simple Sequence Repeat Markers on Linkage Group 6 in Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.)

Abstract: Commercial production of hazelnut (Corylus avellana) in Oregon’s Willamette Valley is threatened by eastern filbert blight (EFB), a serious canker disease caused by the pyrenomycete Anisogramma anomala (Peck) E. Müller. The fungus also prevents the establishment of hazelnut orchards in eastern North America. Genetic resistance is considered the most effective way to control the disease. A high level of EFB resistance was first discovered in ’Gasaway’. This resistance is conferred by a dominant allele at a sing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, this linkage map has been improved by additional SSRs and data from a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library ( Sathuvalli et al 2017 ; Mehlenbacher and Bhattarai 2018 ). To assign the linkage groups to pseudo-chromosomal scaffolds, 18 RAPD, 874 microsatellite, 4,100 paired BAC-ends with proper insert size, and 15,000 biallelic SNP marker sequence fragments were aligned to both Jefferson haplotypes using minimap2 ( Li 2018 ), and compared to previous linkage mapping designations ( Komaei Koma 2020 ). Both haplotypes were successfully assigned the same linkage group for each corresponding pseudo-chromosomal scaffold and renamed appropriately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, this linkage map has been improved by additional SSRs and data from a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library ( Sathuvalli et al 2017 ; Mehlenbacher and Bhattarai 2018 ). To assign the linkage groups to pseudo-chromosomal scaffolds, 18 RAPD, 874 microsatellite, 4,100 paired BAC-ends with proper insert size, and 15,000 biallelic SNP marker sequence fragments were aligned to both Jefferson haplotypes using minimap2 ( Li 2018 ), and compared to previous linkage mapping designations ( Komaei Koma 2020 ). Both haplotypes were successfully assigned the same linkage group for each corresponding pseudo-chromosomal scaffold and renamed appropriately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine mapping of the “Gasaway” region using bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) identified a span of approximately 135 kb and five candidate EFB resistance genes ( Sathuvalli et al 2017 ). Other sources of EFB resistance have been identified and mapped in over 30 C. avellana cultivars and accessions, and while the majority map to LG6 ( Sathuvalli et al 2012 ; Colburn et al 2015 ; Komaei Koma 2020 ), other sources of qualitative and quantitative resistance have been mapped to LG2 ( Sathuvalli, Mehlenbacher, et al 2011 ; Şekerli et al 2021 ), LG7 ( Sathuvalli et al 2011 ; Bhattarai et al 2017 ; Şekerli et al 2021 ), LG10 and LG11 ( Lombardoni et al 2022 ), and more recently LG4 and LG1 (Mehlenbacher personal communication). A complete summary of resistant cultivars and their related linkage groups can be found in Table 1 of Mehlenbacher et al (2023) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gene (CamerWinkler.08G009300) is, therefore, a promising target for future functional characterization. Quantitative genetic analyses have revealed numerous loci in C. americana that are associated with EFB resistance (Komaei Koma et al ., 2021 ; Lombardoni et al ., 2022 ; Revord et al ., 2020 ), and the gene reported here could be productively included in any future studies aimed at using expression analysis or forward genetic approaches to validating their role in plant defence pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease was reported several decades ago (Barss, 1930; Cameron, 1976). Intense research delivered resistant cultivars, and the search for resistant genotypes continues (Bhattarai et al., 2017; Capik et al., 2013; Coyne et al, 1998; Komaei Koma et al., 2021; Mehlenbacher et al., 1991; Molnar et al., 2007; Muehlbauer et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%