1995
DOI: 10.2307/4110642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Species in Endogone (Endogonales)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In two of the fossils, the gametangia differ from each other in size, and thus are termed macro- and microgametangium. The condition seen in the fossils closely corresponds to that in certain modern representatives of the Endogonaceae (see Bucholtz 1912, Thaxter 1922, Yao et al 1996). Moreover, it has been observed that in certain Endogonaceae the gametangium walls increase in thickness after gametangial fusion, and thus may remain intact even until zygosporangium maturation (e.g., Bucholtz 1912: 162).…”
Section: Fossils Interpreted As or Compared To Zygomycetous Fungisupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In two of the fossils, the gametangia differ from each other in size, and thus are termed macro- and microgametangium. The condition seen in the fossils closely corresponds to that in certain modern representatives of the Endogonaceae (see Bucholtz 1912, Thaxter 1922, Yao et al 1996). Moreover, it has been observed that in certain Endogonaceae the gametangium walls increase in thickness after gametangial fusion, and thus may remain intact even until zygosporangium maturation (e.g., Bucholtz 1912: 162).…”
Section: Fossils Interpreted As or Compared To Zygomycetous Fungisupporting
confidence: 68%
“…1f–h): The open ends would correspond to the attachment sites of the gametangia to the subtending suspensors, which do not have secondarily thickened walls, and thus rapidly disintegrate following maturation of the zygosporangium and zygospore. Adding support to this interpretation is the fact that the configuration exhibited by these fossils is virtually identical to that seen in several of the zygosporangia with attached paired gametangia of extant Endogone species (e.g., Yao et al 1996: pl. 4, f. 30, Błaszkowski et al 1998: f. 5, 2004: f. 8).…”
Section: Fossils Interpreted As or Compared To Zygomycetous Fungimentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, modern Sclerocystis forms spores in sporocarps bounded by a massive peridium (Yao et al . 1996). The absence of a peridium argues against affinities of the fossil to Sclerocystis .…”
Section: Mutualistic Fungal Interactions (Mycorrhizas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the configuration exhibited by H. taylorii in fact corresponds to that seen in Endogone, then the subtending structure in the fossil represents a very large macrogametangium, or the macrogametangium plus the macrosuspensor (with the septum between the two structures not preserved or not recognizable). Arguing against affinities of H. taylorii with the Endogonaceae is perhaps the fact that the majority of extant Endogonaceae produce zygosporangia clustered in unstructured masses or in structured sporocarps (Yao et al 1996). There is, however, one genus in the Endogonaceae-that is, Peridiospora CG Wu et Suh J Lin-for which the production of unisporic zygosporocarps is characteristic (Wu and Lin 1997).…”
Section: Position O/^halifaxia Tayiorii Within the Zygomycetous Fungimentioning
confidence: 97%