New Strategies to Explain Organizational Resilience on the Firms: A Cross-Countries Configurations Approach

Abstract

Organizations need to develop their resilience to foster future success to survive complex environments. This research conducts a comparative analysis to understand firms’ strategies in a “black swan” event. We use the “strategy tripod” to operationalize resilience theory and explain the configurations or pathways that lead to high organizational resilience in a crisis context. The data correspond to 1936 firms drawn from the “Enterprise Survey 2020 for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China (ESIEC)”, and to 66 Central American firms drawn from the “World Bank 2020 Enterprise Surveys” are also analyzed. The methodological approach fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is applied. We discuss and analyze the strategies of companies in this “new normal”; our results establish that in the case of emerging economies, organizational innovation seems to be a necessary condition for becoming an organizational resilience to a black swan crisis (finding from both cases). We also found that labor flexibility and emotional intelligence for the case of firms from China, and adequate control of the turbulence environment for the cases of Central America, were also necessary conditions for each region. We further argue that digitalization depends on access to government support for its success. China reinforces its strategies in an intensification of human resources flexibility. In addition, they are better prepared for the “black swan” crisis, allowing them to adapt quickly and generate business model innovation to mitigate the effects of the pandemic in this “new normal.” In contrast, Central America needs rapid organization for organizational resilience.

An integrative framework for building organizational resilience through environmental scanning: a view of organizational information processing theory

“…Additionally, Vakilzadeh and Haase (2021) claimed that fostering OR depends on an organization's ability to innovate in the face of adversity. Similarly, the results of Heredia et al (2022) show that OI appears to be a prerequisite for emerging economies' ability to withstand a black swan catastrophe. Therefore, we suggest the following hypothesis: H6.…”

Success factors of organizational resilience: a qualitative investigation of four types of sustainable digital entrepreneurs

“…Digitalization (Casalino et al, 2019;He et al, 2022;H€ olzle et al, 2020;Klein and Todesco, 2021;Syed et al, 2020;Velu et al, 2019) and sustainability (Ates and Bititci, 2011;Florez-Jimenez et al, 2021;Griese et al, 2018a, b;Ortiz-de-Mandojana and Bansal, 2016;Winnard et al, 2018) have been perceived as drivers, context and outcomes of SME resilience. For example, recent works view digitalization as a capability that can enhance resilience (Florez-Jimenez et al, 2021;He et al, 2022;Heredia et al, 2022;Khurana et al, 2022;Postolea and Bodea, 2021;Xu et al, 2022). Artificial intelligence can improve flexibility, agility and the exploitation of information from complex Big Data (Ciampi and Rialti, 2018).…”

Are you resilient? Machine learning prediction of corporate rebound out of the Covid‐19 pandemic

“…Innovation is possibly the most studied factor of resilience in large turbulent environments (Hamel & Valikangas, 2003, and DesJardine et al, 2019, or Heredia et al, 2022). Furthermore, innovative activities per se can also be characterized by resilience as they are strongly path‐dependent and cumulative in nature (Nelson & Winter, 1982).…”