2013
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012468895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Street Geographies: The Impact of Urban Governance on the Mobilities of Cape Town’s Street Youth

Abstract: Street youth have been part of South Africa's cities since the 1980s, maintaining a visible and mobile presence. Contemporary adaptations to urban governance strategies in Cape Town have resulted in management practices that are creating challenges for street youth's lives. This paper explores these challenges which have emerged through strategies to clean up the city and are aimed at reducing youth's visible presence on the streets. Through an examination of street youth's lives, this paper conceptualises fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Interviews were carried out in Hmong, Yao or Vietnamese with the aid of interpreters/research assistants of the same ethnicity, or were completed independently. 2 The most developed strand of work explicitly focusing on 'mobilities' with a Global South focus is work on mobilities of youth, and particularly street youth (Gough, 2008;Porter et al, 2010;Butcher, 2011;van Blerk, 2013). Work has also been completed on the urban poor, with particular emphasis on gender differences in access to mobility options (Mandel, 2006;Srinivasan, 2008;Tanzarn, 2008;Ureta, 2008;Salon & Gulyani, 2010;Jaffe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Interviews were carried out in Hmong, Yao or Vietnamese with the aid of interpreters/research assistants of the same ethnicity, or were completed independently. 2 The most developed strand of work explicitly focusing on 'mobilities' with a Global South focus is work on mobilities of youth, and particularly street youth (Gough, 2008;Porter et al, 2010;Butcher, 2011;van Blerk, 2013). Work has also been completed on the urban poor, with particular emphasis on gender differences in access to mobility options (Mandel, 2006;Srinivasan, 2008;Tanzarn, 2008;Ureta, 2008;Salon & Gulyani, 2010;Jaffe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most developed strand of work explicitly focusing on ‘mobilities’ with a Global South focus is work on mobilities of youth, and particularly street youth (Gough, ; Porter et al ., ; Butcher, ; van Blerk, ). Work has also been completed on the urban poor, with particular emphasis on gender differences in access to mobility options (Mandel, ; Srinivasan, ; Tanzarn, ; Ureta, ; Salon & Gulyani, ; Jaffe et al ., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heeding the recent call to pay more attention to the “micro mobilities” and “micro geographies” of youth in their local surroundings (Holt & Costello, 2011; Horton, Christensen, Kraftl, & Hadfield-Hill, 2014; Van Blerk, 2013), we demonstrate how this wandering works in three ways. First, wandering is a legitimate way for girls to be outside; second, it enables girls to escape social control both inside and outside the house; and third, it makes it possible for girls to interact with boys in public space even if in a very fleeting way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As a result, youth are not systematically included in global planning processes despite their demographic and socioeconomic importance (Talen and Coffindaffer 1999; Frank 2006; Knowles-Yánez 2005). Moreover, in many developing world cities, the response to the youth bulge has been fear, often seeking to control or diffuse youth’s needs rather than engage youth with relevant institutions (Mabala 2011; van Blerk 2013). Thus, mismatches grow between urban development plans and young peoples’ desires for their neighborhoods, resulting in youth dissatisfaction (Passon, Levi, and del Rio 2008; Laughlin and Johnson 2011; Kruger and Chawla 2002).…”
Section: Vulnerable Youth and Planning In Informal Settlementsmentioning
confidence: 99%