1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-874x(94)00055-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New structural matrices for a beam element with shear deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown in [1,4] that the proposed solution algorithm improves the performance of CBT significantly, especially in cases where thin-walled box type cross-section are considered and torsional loading is applied. Additionally, our GBT formulation enhances the predictive quality in beam problems with unsymmetric cross-sections where Schramm et al [8,9] observed that shear elastic transverse bending load cases do not decouple based on the eigenvector of the bending stiffness tensor. Further, it can be shown that stress distributions in FGM cross-sections can be improved by our GBT formulation.…”
Section: Member Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is shown in [1,4] that the proposed solution algorithm improves the performance of CBT significantly, especially in cases where thin-walled box type cross-section are considered and torsional loading is applied. Additionally, our GBT formulation enhances the predictive quality in beam problems with unsymmetric cross-sections where Schramm et al [8,9] observed that shear elastic transverse bending load cases do not decouple based on the eigenvector of the bending stiffness tensor. Further, it can be shown that stress distributions in FGM cross-sections can be improved by our GBT formulation.…”
Section: Member Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…where E is the Young's modulus of elasticity; G is the shear modulus of the material;˛is a shear coefficient factor that depends on the shape of the cross-section [27], and…”
Section: Closed-form Equations Of Stiffness and Mass Matrices Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the formulation presented in this work, no additional terms are necessary to develop the geometric stiffness matrix since shape functions are obtained directly from the solution of the differential equations of the problem, considering the Timoshenko beam theory. Schramm et al (1994) and Pilkey et al (1995) also developed a stiffness matrix from the differential equations considering shear effects; however, shape functions were not developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%